In Reply to: i don't care whether you believe or not. do your own research (nt) posted by Christine Tham on December 13, 2005 at 21:29:50:
.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- According to Microsoft themselves... HDCD process hasn't changed. See link. Whats your point?... - Steve Cortez 04:44:34 12/17/05 (58)
- Read very carefully - Christine Tham 13:31:19 12/17/05 (57)
- Wrong again - Charles Hansen 15:54:33 12/17/05 (56)
- For reference, can you educate me on exactly which part of my post is "wrong again"? - Christine Tham 22:58:24 12/17/05 (0)
- Yikes! - Christine Tham 22:38:27 12/17/05 (54)
- You've COMPLETELY missed Charles' main retort on your "Peak Extend" argument... - Steve Cortez 01:31:21 12/18/05 (53)
- No - Charles is just plain wrong, or at least very self serving - Christine Tham 12:08:43 12/18/05 (52)
- blah blah blah... the only one PUSHING a point is you... - Steve Cortez 15:28:54 12/18/05 (51)
- why are you so angry? - Christine Tham 22:12:04 12/18/05 (50)
- You are way off base - Charles Hansen 12:01:38 12/19/05 (49)
- No Charles, it is you who is off base - Christine Tham 15:21:21 12/19/05 (48)
- Reading comprehension an issue? - Charles Hansen 21:26:14 12/19/05 (47)
- Re: Reading comprehension an issue? - Martin419 08:23:52 12/21/05 (0)
- Wow - racerguy 07:11:29 12/21/05 (1)
- I stand corrected - Charles Hansen 09:48:09 12/21/05 (0)
- Maybe you could do with a crash course on how to use search as well? - Christine Tham 23:11:37 12/19/05 (43)
- You want an apology? - Charles Hansen 22:17:21 12/20/05 (38)
- Perhaps it is you who has reading comprehension issues? - Christine Tham 00:59:31 12/22/05 (18)
- This is just silly - Charles Hansen 09:08:41 12/22/05 (17)
- Who is being silly? - Christine Tham 11:49:06 12/22/05 (16)
- That would be you - Charles Hansen 20:27:20 12/22/05 (15)
- Re: That would be you - Christine Tham 15:23:38 12/23/05 (14)
- Re: That would be you - Charles Hansen 20:14:53 12/23/05 (13)
- Re: That would be you - Christine Tham 00:01:07 12/24/05 (12)
- Figure 3: Digital rip of an HDCD without Peak Extend - Christine Tham 00:09:39 12/24/05 (9)
- Figure 4: Output of WMP (no Peak Extend) - Christine Tham 00:11:08 12/24/05 (8)
- By the way, here are some stats on the non decoded vs decoded outputs - Christine Tham 00:28:38 12/24/05 (7)
- Thanks for posting these graphs - Charles Hansen 10:51:35 12/24/05 (6)
- Re: Thanks for posting these graphs - Christine Tham 12:12:00 12/24/05 (5)
- This is just silly - Charles Hansen 14:46:22 12/24/05 (4)
- HDCD is defined by the patent, not the implementation - Christine Tham 22:38:00 12/24/05 (3)
- Oh, that's right... - Charles Hansen 13:06:23 12/25/05 (2)
- And your point is? - Christine Tham 15:31:48 01/03/06 (1)
- Yep, yep, and yep. - Charles Hansen 19:43:56 01/03/06 (0)
- Figure 1: Digital rip of an HDCD with Peak Extend - Christine Tham 00:04:18 12/24/05 (1)
- Figure 2: WMP decoded output of the track - Christine Tham 00:06:28 12/24/05 (0)
- Charles you do owe Christine an apology, because you are dead wrong. Christine has it 100% correct. - Teresa 06:51:43 12/21/05 (18)
- Hmmm... - Charles Hansen 09:34:25 12/21/05 (17)
- Charles I have found some links to help you understand HDCD better: - Teresa 19:38:30 12/21/05 (3)
- Re: Charles I have found some links to help you understand HDCD better: - Charles Hansen 20:07:24 12/21/05 (2)
- Thanks for the links Charles, it will take a while to read all of these. - Teresa 20:46:09 12/21/05 (1)
- You're welcome - Charles Hansen 22:00:32 12/21/05 (0)
- Still waiting for that apology ... - Christine Tham 16:52:05 12/21/05 (12)
- You are still confused - Charles Hansen 19:52:19 12/21/05 (11)
- Re: You are still confused - Christine Tham 00:01:40 12/22/05 (10)
- Taking a page from W - Charles Hansen 09:11:58 12/22/05 (9)
- Re: Taking a page from W - Christine Tham 11:54:11 12/22/05 (8)
- I guess we agree on one thing - Charles Hansen 20:03:13 12/22/05 (7)
- Re: I guess we agree on one thing - Christine Tham 15:25:13 12/23/05 (6)
- Re: I guess we agree on one thing - Charles Hansen 20:16:22 12/23/05 (5)
- Re: I guess we agree on one thing - Christine Tham 00:38:47 12/24/05 (4)
- Once again you are wrong - Charles Hansen 11:00:41 12/24/05 (3)
- I don't think you know the meaning of the word "wrong", since you are not applying it correctly - Christine Tham 12:25:41 12/24/05 (2)
- You have gone beyond obstinence... - Charles Hansen 18:49:44 12/24/05 (1)
- Sorry, but you haven't really given any evidence - Christine Tham 22:47:18 12/24/05 (0)
- I did find the HDCD patent (#5,479,168) - Christine Tham 23:30:02 12/19/05 (3)
- Christine -- give it a rest. You were interesting once. nt. - Martin419 02:58:46 12/21/05 (2)
- I'm sure Christine will as soon as Charles apologizes. She is 100% correct BTW. (nt) - Teresa 07:00:12 12/21/05 (1)
- Thanks, Teresa (nt) - Christine Tham 17:03:58 12/21/05 (0)