In Reply to: Re: HQV posted by John Kotches on September 20, 2005 at 04:22:20:
it's "pixel-based motion adaptive", *not* motion compensated. pity. they do go down to the resolution of 1 pixel though, which is better than most (nvidia for example works on blocks of pixels - i can actually see the blocks on the screen on certain scenes).*** to dismiss a noise reduction algorithm without seeing it in action is a bit disappointing ***
i wasn't dismissing it, just saying i can live without it - not the same thing. i'm a "purist", remember? :-)
*** it becomes a moot point as to whether it is compensated or adaptive as they are very good results. ***
now who is dismissing technology without seeing it in action? :-)
i *have* seen proper motion compensation in both spatial and temporal domains, and believe me it makes a big difference :-) teranex themselves have a white paper on it, pity they haven't implemented it in HQV :-(
*** Algolith product does the best job, with the HQV right behind ***
Algolith uses the Silicon Optix HQV chipset.
*** You don't realize how annoying all the noise is in DVD-Video until someone removes it. ***
Except when the noise is *intentional*, in which case it's downright annoying that an algorithm has reversed a creative decision. i can think of a few titles offhand that falls into this category ...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- just checked on the web site - Christine Tham 05:41:41 09/20/05 (3)
- Re: just checked on the web site - John Kotches 05:51:16 09/20/05 (2)
- Re: just checked on the web site - Christine Tham 06:14:18 09/20/05 (1)
- Re: just checked on the web site - John Kotches 06:34:14 09/20/05 (0)