In Reply to: HQV posted by Christine Tham on September 19, 2005 at 18:30:46:
They aren't specific about motion compensated vs. motion adaptive, I suspect they are compensated. This would apply to native interlaced material (video mode) only, since they wouldn't need to do any work on film based material that has been properly recovered.Based on results on video based material I've seen scaled by HQV it becomes a moot point as to whether it is compensated or adaptive as they are very good results.
For someone as well versed as you are in digital technology to dismiss a noise reduction algorithm without seeing it in action is a bit disappointing. I think the Algolith product does the best job, with the HQV right behind and both make a substantial improvement over raw video.
You don't realize how annoying all the noise is in DVD-Video until someone removes it.
Regards,
John Kotches
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: HQV - John Kotches 04:22:20 09/20/05 (4)
- just checked on the web site - Christine Tham 05:41:41 09/20/05 (3)
- Re: just checked on the web site - John Kotches 05:51:16 09/20/05 (2)
- Re: just checked on the web site - Christine Tham 06:14:18 09/20/05 (1)
- Re: just checked on the web site - John Kotches 06:34:14 09/20/05 (0)