|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: Chinese Whispers? posted by John Atkinson on March 7, 2007 at 10:09:41:
>>No you would be wrong, the article contained just, as the previous
>>poster put it, chinese whispers.>I think you must be hard of thinking, "bjh." "Chinese Whispers"
>means that the message became garbled in its passageI think you must be hard of comprehending as clearly I meant "Chinese Whispers" in the sense used by the "previous poster". Here's the content of the post in question:
---
"I believe they need to address it publicly, at the least, to maintain their credibility"And foster yet more unsubstantiated rumours? All we have at the moment are chinese whispers, it does not amount to a hill of beans, until someone actually publishes the details of the incident in print for public consumption, their current course of action is the course of least damage.
---Get it now, i.e. the part about "unsubstantiated rumours"?
Things such as augmenting the tale, exaggerating details, etc. are all aspect of the operation of Chinese Whispers (or Operator, or any of a number of other common names for it), and from that perspective Dudley certainly took liberties. However not need to recount, I've already had my say on the topic.
No Guru, No Method, No Teacher
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - bjh 11:20:41 03/07/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]