In Reply to: They've taken care ot it... posted by mkuller on March 5, 2007 at 12:00:17:
"I believe they need to address it publicly, at the least, to maintain their credibility"And foster yet more unsubstantiated rumours? All we have at the moment are chinese whispers, it does not amount to a hill of beans, until someone actually publishes the details of the incident in print for public consumption, their current course of action is the course of least damage.
Music making the painting, recording it the photograph
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Bye, bye TAS... - mkuller 21:10:47 03/04/07 (122)
- Re: Bye, bye TAS... - tmartin 14:15:15 03/06/07 (62)
- ...truly sorry requires a PENANCE - PeAK 04:06:37 03/14/07 (2)
- Re: ...truly sorry requires a PENANCE - jimmycj 20:20:56 04/08/07 (1)
- Re: ...truly sorry requires a PENANCE - PeAK 16:55:47 04/15/07 (0)
- Who reimbursed TAS? - eungkim67 15:47:14 03/09/07 (3)
- The real story... - mkuller 10:36:07 03/10/07 (2)
- "The real story..."? - bjh 12:32:00 03/10/07 (1)
- Let's just say... - mkuller 13:22:16 03/10/07 (1)
- Re: Bye, bye TAS... - TomLarson 11:48:38 03/07/07 (16)
- I'm not trying to be an antagonist here, - Bruce Kendall 11:58:11 03/07/07 (15)
- Re: I'm not trying to be an antagonist here, - TomLarson 16:18:59 03/07/07 (14)
- no gifts, no accomodation will result in better reviews - jdouglas51 09:33:12 03/08/07 (2)
- Re: no gifts, no accomodation will result in better reviews - john curl 13:58:24 03/08/07 (1)
- Re: no gifts, no accomodation will result in better reviews - jdouglas51 06:24:17 03/09/07 (0)
- no gifts, no accomodation will result in better reviews - jdouglas51 09:31:21 03/08/07 (1)
- I agree. And that day doesn't sound like it's going to happen. nt - TomLarson 11:29:01 03/08/07 (0)
- That is quite a mouthful. - Bruce Kendall 19:46:56 03/07/07 (4)
- Re: That is quite a mouthful. - TomLarson 07:54:09 03/08/07 (3)
- My interpretation of the explanation given is - Bruce Kendall 10:52:09 03/08/07 (2)
- Re: My interpretation of the explanation given is - TomLarson 11:27:10 03/08/07 (1)
- Thanks, Tom. - Bruce Kendall 11:46:30 03/08/07 (0)
- Consumer Reports audio equipment reviews are for you...(nt) - mkuller 18:33:34 03/07/07 (3)
- Re: Consumer Reports audio equipment reviews are for you...(nt) - TomLarson 11:42:06 03/08/07 (2)
- Ahhh...youthful idealism... - mkuller 11:55:14 03/08/07 (1)
- Re: Ahhh...youthful idealism... - TomLarson 16:23:18 03/08/07 (0)
- There are really two issues here... - mkuller 10:41:48 03/07/07 (0)
- I realize that Valin is a fiction writer of some note - Charles Hansen 19:25:32 03/06/07 (6)
- Fiction writer of some note... - mkuller 15:09:29 03/07/07 (0)
- Re: I realize that Valin is a fiction writer of some note - john curl 21:45:51 03/06/07 (4)
- Re: I realize that Valin is a fiction writer of some note - Charles Hansen 22:05:25 03/06/07 (3)
- I don't see you pushing the magazines to adopt - bjh 04:31:49 03/07/07 (0)
- Re: I realize that Valin is a fiction writer of some note - john curl 01:35:47 03/07/07 (1)
- Re: I realize that Valin is a fiction writer of some note - morricab 02:25:20 03/07/07 (1)
- Re: Bye, bye TAS... - john curl 17:35:27 03/06/07 (28)
- Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 04:15:11 03/07/07 (27)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - bjh 10:05:45 03/07/07 (26)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 10:28:06 03/07/07 (25)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 10:37:00 03/07/07 (0)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - Brian Walsh 10:35:35 03/07/07 (23)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 12:49:19 03/07/07 (22)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - john curl 15:19:52 03/07/07 (21)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - Jonathan Scull 08:31:34 03/08/07 (0)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 06:44:49 03/08/07 (19)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - john curl 12:47:55 03/08/07 (18)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - Jonathan Scull 14:07:55 03/08/07 (0)
- The End of the Affair? - John Atkinson 14:05:23 03/08/07 (16)
- Re: The End of the Affair? - john curl 14:43:18 03/08/07 (15)
- Re: The End of the Affair? - John Atkinson 16:46:19 03/08/07 (14)
- Re: The End of the Affair? - jamesgarvin 14:19:48 03/09/07 (1)
- I admit it - nightdoggy 17:11:52 03/09/07 (0)
- Re: The End of the Affair? - john curl 02:03:58 03/09/07 (11)
- Re: The End of the Affair? - John Atkinson 08:49:15 03/09/07 (7)
- John, a somewhat whimsical suggestion - Brian Walsh 19:23:28 03/09/07 (6)
- It's a deal - John Atkinson 05:57:41 03/10/07 (4)
- Re: It's a deal - Brian Walsh 17:49:55 03/10/07 (3)
- Re: It's a deal - Charles Hansen 19:09:23 03/10/07 (2)
- Re: It's a deal - Brian Walsh 19:29:01 03/10/07 (1)
- Re: It's a deal - biased 22:27:00 03/13/07 (0)
- Re: John, a somewhat whimsical suggestion - john curl 01:06:06 03/10/07 (0)
- Best leave it... - bjh 05:08:12 03/09/07 (2)
- Maybe listen to your own advice... - robert young 13:28:49 03/10/07 (0)
- Re: Best leave it... - John Atkinson 14:15:21 03/09/07 (0)
- It is helpful, and we all know stuff happens. - Bruce Kendall 14:27:07 03/06/07 (0)
- Now thart Charlie's outed the offender.... - Bob Rex 13:58:00 03/06/07 (1)
- Au contrair..... - mkuller 14:05:48 03/06/07 (0)
- Regardless of the issue discussed below, I thought the - chris keating 06:16:55 03/06/07 (0)
- What happened? - shamburg 05:48:07 03/06/07 (7)
- This link is more cogent to the matter at hand. - Charles Hansen 09:08:35 03/06/07 (5)
- Thanks, Charlie. But the question remains… - shamburg 09:31:41 03/06/07 (4)
- Re: Thanks, Charlie. But the question remains… - Charles Hansen 10:35:37 03/06/07 (3)
- Right on CH. - nightdoggy 17:28:01 03/09/07 (0)
- Well, well, well... nt - clarkjohnsen 11:54:00 03/06/07 (1)
- Three holes in the ground? ~t - three_sox 17:44:02 03/06/07 (0)
- Here's a link to previous discussion here... - Ted Smith 08:41:09 03/06/07 (0)
- Re: Bye, bye TAS... - jamesgarvin 14:09:46 03/05/07 (0)
- Call me dense or something, - Bruce Kendall 11:08:25 03/05/07 (30)
- Without coming clean . . . - markrohr 15:19:28 03/05/07 (15)
- Nixon (OT) - Charles Hansen 20:32:07 03/05/07 (13)
- Re: Nixon (OT) - regmac 08:17:39 03/07/07 (2)
- Re: Nixon (OT) - Charles Hansen 09:20:38 03/07/07 (1)
- Re: Nixon (OT) - Ozzie 11:04:58 03/08/07 (0)
- Most historians would agree with you, Charles - David W. Robinson 21:47:21 03/05/07 (9)
- Nixon: Guilty of "Mens Rea," but not of being the brains of the outfit. - John Marks 12:54:11 03/06/07 (4)
- [RMN] was being manipulated and indeed set up." Hmmm... - clarkjohnsen 14:15:00 03/06/07 (3)
- The military-industrial complex... - David W. Robinson 17:17:09 03/06/07 (2)
- And where is Ellen Rometsch today? - John Marks 18:20:09 03/06/07 (1)
- Rometsch in the news recently -- well, kinda... - clarkjohnsen 08:26:06 03/07/07 (0)
- Jeez, don't you think that - markrohr 03:30:16 03/06/07 (3)
- No, I do not... - David W. Robinson 08:51:14 03/06/07 (2)
- Alas, such hysterics are - markrohr 09:44:50 03/06/07 (1)
- We agree to disagree... - David W. Robinson 17:07:17 03/06/07 (0)
- I agree there has to be some form of public cleansing. - Bruce Kendall 15:42:29 03/05/07 (0)
- Re: Call me dense or something, - TomLarson 11:32:48 03/05/07 (13)
- They've taken care ot it... - mkuller 12:00:17 03/05/07 (11)
- Re: They've taken care ot it... - Charles Hansen 20:34:22 03/05/07 (4)
- "Concrete galoshes" - andy_c 21:16:22 03/05/07 (3)
- It's a regionalism. ;-) nt - markrohr 09:46:44 03/06/07 (2)
- It's a Star Trek-ism (the old one) - andy_c 09:53:24 03/06/07 (1)
- So it is! I used to know that. nt - markrohr 11:59:26 03/06/07 (0)
- Re: They've taken care ot it... - theaudiohobby 12:11:16 03/05/07 (4)
- Details... - mkuller 12:17:20 03/05/07 (3)
- No you would be wrong, the article contained just, as the previous poster put it, chinese whispers. nt - bjh 14:32:59 03/05/07 (2)
- Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 10:09:41 03/07/07 (1)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - bjh 11:20:41 03/07/07 (0)
- Meanwhile... - newyorkp7 12:07:09 03/05/07 (0)
- I'm a little less dense than I was before. - Bruce Kendall 11:46:39 03/05/07 (1)
- Re: Bye, bye TAS... - Charles Hansen 22:19:23 03/04/07 (11)
- Re: Bye, bye TAS... - Wendell Narrod 06:48:31 03/05/07 (10)
- True, but... - John Atkinson 08:55:46 03/05/07 (9)
- Re: True, but... - Wendell Narrod 11:24:46 03/05/07 (4)
- Re: True, but... - John Atkinson 11:36:16 03/05/07 (3)
- \\\given the wide circulation being given this matter///......... - three_sox 17:03:15 03/05/07 (2)
- Re: \\\given the wide circulation being given this matter///......... - John Atkinson 03:52:16 03/06/07 (1)
- Re: \\\given the wide circulation being given this matter///......... - three_sox 04:06:47 03/06/07 (0)
- Re: True, but... - mls-stl 09:18:35 03/05/07 (3)
- Glad not all general newspapers follow this line of reasoning. nt - TomLarson 10:54:38 03/05/07 (2)
- Re: Glad not all general newspapers follow this line of reasoning.... - mls-stl 15:52:57 03/05/07 (1)
- Re: Glad not all general newspapers follow this line of reasoning.... - TomLarson 17:39:22 03/05/07 (0)
- Not the last - kavakidd 22:18:59 03/04/07 (3)
- Re: Not the last - Charles Hansen 22:22:26 03/04/07 (2)
- Re: Not the last - Craiger56 10:49:31 03/05/07 (1)
- The Shadow knows! :) nt - bjh 14:37:08 03/05/07 (0)
Follow Ups
- Re: They've taken care ot it... - theaudiohobby 12:11:16 03/05/07 (4)
- Details... - mkuller 12:17:20 03/05/07 (3)
- No you would be wrong, the article contained just, as the previous poster put it, chinese whispers. nt - bjh 14:32:59 03/05/07 (2)
- Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 10:09:41 03/07/07 (1)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - bjh 11:20:41 03/07/07 (0)