In Reply to: Bye, bye TAS... posted by mkuller on March 4, 2007 at 21:10:47:
but I still fail to understand how or why so many are willing to convict an entire organization for the actions of an individual. TAS still puts out a great product.At the risk of repeating myself, I'll repeat myself. This is a litigious world we live in. I suspect any action TAS might want to take has to be done with a certain degree of sensitivity. The system frowns on stringing people up from trees these days.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Call me dense or something, - Bruce Kendall 11:08:25 03/05/07 (30)
- Without coming clean . . . - markrohr 15:19:28 03/05/07 (15)
- Nixon (OT) - Charles Hansen 20:32:07 03/05/07 (13)
- Re: Nixon (OT) - regmac 08:17:39 03/07/07 (2)
- Re: Nixon (OT) - Charles Hansen 09:20:38 03/07/07 (1)
- Re: Nixon (OT) - Ozzie 11:04:58 03/08/07 (0)
- Most historians would agree with you, Charles - David W. Robinson 21:47:21 03/05/07 (9)
- Nixon: Guilty of "Mens Rea," but not of being the brains of the outfit. - John Marks 12:54:11 03/06/07 (4)
- [RMN] was being manipulated and indeed set up." Hmmm... - clarkjohnsen 14:15:00 03/06/07 (3)
- The military-industrial complex... - David W. Robinson 17:17:09 03/06/07 (2)
- And where is Ellen Rometsch today? - John Marks 18:20:09 03/06/07 (1)
- Rometsch in the news recently -- well, kinda... - clarkjohnsen 08:26:06 03/07/07 (0)
- Jeez, don't you think that - markrohr 03:30:16 03/06/07 (3)
- No, I do not... - David W. Robinson 08:51:14 03/06/07 (2)
- Alas, such hysterics are - markrohr 09:44:50 03/06/07 (1)
- We agree to disagree... - David W. Robinson 17:07:17 03/06/07 (0)
- I agree there has to be some form of public cleansing. - Bruce Kendall 15:42:29 03/05/07 (0)
- Re: Call me dense or something, - TomLarson 11:32:48 03/05/07 (13)
- They've taken care ot it... - mkuller 12:00:17 03/05/07 (11)
- Re: They've taken care ot it... - Charles Hansen 20:34:22 03/05/07 (4)
- "Concrete galoshes" - andy_c 21:16:22 03/05/07 (3)
- It's a regionalism. ;-) nt - markrohr 09:46:44 03/06/07 (2)
- It's a Star Trek-ism (the old one) - andy_c 09:53:24 03/06/07 (1)
- So it is! I used to know that. nt - markrohr 11:59:26 03/06/07 (0)
- Re: They've taken care ot it... - theaudiohobby 12:11:16 03/05/07 (4)
- Details... - mkuller 12:17:20 03/05/07 (3)
- No you would be wrong, the article contained just, as the previous poster put it, chinese whispers. nt - bjh 14:32:59 03/05/07 (2)
- Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 10:09:41 03/07/07 (1)
- Re: Chinese Whispers? - bjh 11:20:41 03/07/07 (0)
- Meanwhile... - newyorkp7 12:07:09 03/05/07 (0)
- I'm a little less dense than I was before. - Bruce Kendall 11:46:39 03/05/07 (1)