 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
208.58.2.83
In Reply to: RE: Just curious: What's "normal polarity"? nt posted by Dave Pogue on July 06, 2007 at 08:32:57
s
Follow Ups:
... you've been cluttering up AA for quite a while. Meant, one assumes, to reassert your primacy in the polarity area in the face of various attempts to simplify or illuminate the matter and make useful sense of it. You will tell us, no doubt, that it is impossible to actually define "normal" and "inverted" (or whatever) polarity and so we should pretty much give it up and look to the master for whatever grudging guidance might be forthcoming. Please, please prove me wrong :-)
...were they not so gratifyingly wrong, therefore merely amusing.
Perhaps some day, if you keep the eyes and ears open -- especially the latter -- you'll be rewarded as many of us have, with a knowledge of polarity.
Any attentive listener can do it without me, just as I did it without help.
So, enough with your foolish animus already; go, learn.
clark
He has your number. 'Nuff said.
Then judge for yourselves.
clark
Look at your actions and replies. No answers, no solutions other than "try reversing your leads and see what you like." You have smeared everyone who has attempted to help your "cause", berating them but at the same time refusing to commit yourself. Perhaps you like screaming into the night, and you certainly seem to have isolated yourself from the vast majority of members, both those who hear polarity issues and those who do not. You simply sidestep any serious inquiry by complaining about persecution, dogging any concise answers.
We still are awaiting, with bated breath, your definition of correct polarity, or perhaps what you are saying is that there is no correct polarity. If so, then polarity is a non issue and you need not waste any more bandwidth upon the subject.
Those who endeavor to engage in honest research and ask serious questions, receive one liners and insults. Just look at your treatment of Truthseekerprime, who is on to something and has spent serious thought on the issues. He even admitted to an error in his statements, and publicly admitted it.
If you wish to to be a literal one man band, so be it, but do not carp on the subject without enlightening us mere mortals with at least some tangible knowledge. Any other action would be akin to pissing into the wind.
We await your definition, as that would be a very good first step. One would like to believe after two decades of thought on the subject, you ought to have a nice concise definition, especially since no one else seems to have one.
Stu
f
8^)Just further proof of the truth. Running and dodging again, enh? It was your chance to prove me totally incorrect.
Stu
"If everything I do is wrong, then the opposite must be correct."
- George Castanza
"It's the Even/Odd rule." - May Belt
Clark has already said everyone else is wrong. Is that the point you wished to press home? Somehow I doubt it, but then I like good 'Ole George, even if he is the ultimate non committer. Your post certainly brings up many parallels.
8^)
Stu
Yeah, if I read what Clark seems to imply, that would be correct. If so, I do not know why it should be an issue, following that train of thought.
I believe the quote here is: " If I never say what is correct, I can never be wrong."
8^)
Stu
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
