|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
64.242.0.161
somewhere along the line, someone said balanced power would solve ground loop issues. I have a BPT unit for my front end, but still get the ground loop hum if I use certain outlets. Does this mean I'd need a BPT unit for my entire audio rig, including amps? how much capacity would an amp need (I'm assuming it's more than just what the amp is spec'd as needing)
Follow Ups:
There is a lot of misinformation posted about this topic. The term "ground" is used for both the AC power safety-earth and the audio equipment zero reference, so this increases the confusion.
Let us consider the simplest possible audio system that can have a ground loop. A CD player is connected to an integrated amp. Both the amp and CD player have three-wire power cords and their chassis are connected to the AC safety-earth. The two pieces are connected by standard RCA cables.
This system has a ground loop as long as both pieces are plugged in to proper AC outlets. The loop consists of the AC safety-earth wires in the power cords and the shields of the RCA cables. The shields of the RCA cables carry the audio zero reference. The audio zero reference is connected to the chassis inside each piece of equipment, and each chassis is connected to the AC safety-earth through the third wires in the power cords. It does not matter whether the equipment is plugged in to standard outlets or the output of a balanced power device, the fact that the two AC safety-earth wires are connected through the outlet guarantees that there is a ground loop.
Any continuous loop of wire can have current induced in it if a magnetic field changes within the area enclosed by the loop. This is Faraday's Law, and was discovered in 1831. It is the foundation of electrical generators and motors. One possible source of hum in a system with a ground loop is a time-varying magnetic field (from, say, a power transformer) that extends into the area enclosed by the ground loop. The current flows through the AC safety-earth wires and the RCA shields. The resistance of the shields converts the current into a voltage that appears to be in series with the audio signal. This voltage is amplified and comes out as the hum.
Another possible source of hum is a voltage difference between the AC safety-earth wires of two separate power circuits into which the equipment is plugged. This was the point of Pooge's objections to my recommendation of separate power circuits. This might be an issue in a large building, where the circuits are routed far apart and there is plenty of opportunity for their enclosed loop to contain time-varying magnetic fields, but IME is not a problem in a house where the dedicated circuits are routed close to each other.
Finally, there can be large currents flowing through the AC safety-earth if there are multiple points of attachment to the earth. The resistance of the wiring converts these currents into a voltage that, again, appears in series with the audio signal and comes out as hum. This is the source of hum in systems with video equipment tied to separate audio gear. The cable TV entrance point is attached to earth per code, and this is usually far away from the point where the AC power neutral and safety-earth wiring are attached to earth. Since the earth is not at a uniform potential, the difference is what drives the currents.
Your unfortunate experience with a misunderstanding with the electrician resulted in two circuits that share a single safety-earth wire. If you have no hum with using one of these circuits, then your ground loop is silent. Adding a balanced power device will not make the loop any more silent than it is already, and will not make it go away.
Let me make it clear that I never objected to having two separate power circuits. I haven't been back since my prior mentioned post, but my point in my mentioned post was that IF you had a ground loop, then having two separate circuits would make that loop even larger. You can have ground loop problems in as small a loop as in a single enclosure, so NO you don't need to be large building to have the ground loop created by two circuits matter. The area of the loop is what matters. Even if they are close together, there is some space between them, and it is a lot longer to the circuit breaker box, so the area adds up (length x space between).
My recommendation to plug into the same outlet was merely to aid in diagnosis, in changing the size of the ground loop. However, the proper result could only be obtained by breaking the loop, no matter how large the loop. If there is more than one circuit, the two circuits are "star" grounded at the breaker panel. There should be no other ground connection between the circuits.
Even if you have a ground loop, there must be a coupling mechanism into the signal for it to have an effect. If you have two monoblocks, each with a separate ground back to the breaker box, you get a huge loop if there is a common ground connection between them in the signal lines, which would very likely occur in your preamp, and the coupling would be in the common impedance of the shields. One way to easily diagnosis this is to disconnect ONE of your input to a power amp (after turning everything OFF first!!!) Turn everything on and see if the hum disappears. This should be done after testing the disconnection of any antenna or cable line first, to see if that is the problem.
You don't want to use a cheater plug with the amps!! Although this might break the loop and have the cheated amp grounded through the other amp, it would be through signal lines and pcbs. Any fault might smoke your low level electronics as well as cause a safety hazard.
I would consider using one circuit for one channel, and the other circuit for the other channel, and try to break the ground between the channels in the preamp. Lacking that ability, you're almost resigned to an input transformer on at least one of your amps, which is rather expensive.
Here are the facts, as we know them:The wiring,
* One truly dedicated 120V branch circuit. Consisting of one each dedicated, hot conductor, neutral conductor, and equipment grounding conductor.* Two separate 120V circuits. A 3 wire multi wire branch circuit consisting of two hot conductors (each connected to a breaker fed from each Line in the electrical panel L1 and L2). One shared neutral conductor, and one shared equipment grounding conductor.
* The truly dedicated circuit feeds the preamp and what ever source equipment.
* The two separate circuits,
if a power amp is feed from each separate 120V circuit a hum is heard through the speakers.
Note..... There is only one equipment grounding conductor for both circuits feeding the power amps....
Added note, at idle both amps theoretically are drawing the same amount of current so the two power transformers primary windings are in series with one another and being fed by a difference of potential of 240 volts nominal.* If both power amps are plugged into only one of the separate circuits, that circuit being fed from the same Line in the electrical panel as the truly dedicated circuit, the final result, no hum is heard through the speakers.
*Still the same equipment grounding conductor.
* Why no hum??
Difficult to say without more diagnosis. First I would disconnect the preamp cables from the power amps. Then I would try the power amps in both power supply connections to see if one still hums more than the other. If, for example, it still hums in the three-wire two-circuit mode, I would suspect transformer leakage adding into the ground line instead of cancelling. It may be that a reversal of the transformer leads in one of the amps would correct this. (Don't do this with the power line, since the hot should go through the switch.) It may also be that one circuit is providing a ground loop for the other through the common ground.
If both power arrangements work with no noise when not connected to preamp, then there is probably a ground loop situation that the preamp brings when connected.
Difficult to say without more diagnosis. First I would disconnect the preamp cables from the power amps.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
I believe in one of Steve's earlier posts he did disconnect the ics from the preamp and the two amps. No hum with the ics disconnected.
---------------
I would be curious what the effect, result, would be if Steve left the ics connected to the preamp but unplug the preamp from the 120V power outlet. Also disconnect all input ics from the preamp.
This test would still have the two power amps signal ground tied together at the preamp jacks. Would there still be a hum?
Your thoughts, or Al's, or any one else's.......
The preamp circuit and the power amp circuit have separate safety-earth wires that go back to the circuit breaker panel. According to Steve, this setup, with both monoblocks fed from one hot wire, does not hum.
Therefore the use of the second hot wire for one monoblock is the proximate cause of the hum. Whether it is because of the small residual current in the neutral wire, or mismatched power transformer parasitic capacitances, would have to be determined by some simple experiments and measurements.
Therefore the use of the second hot wire for one monoblock is the proximate cause of the hum. Whether it is because of the small residual current in the neutral wire, or mismatched power transformer parasitic capacitances, would have to be determined by some simple experiments and measurements.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
How about this for a test, have Steve plug one of the power amps into the dedicated circuit with the preamp. Leave the other amp plugged into the separate circuit outlet that is on the same Line, leg, as the preamp recept.
We would have all the audio equipment being fed from the same Line, leg, of the electrical panel. Will there be a hum?
----------------------
I wonder how many guys out there think they had two dedicated circuits installed by an electrician for the audio equipment, and instead have two separate circuits.......
If there is hum with this configuration, then it is time to check the individual amp power transformers.
I should add that reversing the transformer leads to correct this might only be a bandaid approach for this particular power circuit arrangement. It may compromise the noise in a normal arrangement.
Tranformers have a different leakage capacitance from each side of a winding and ground. Therefore, one lead orientation will couple a different amount of noise to ground than the opposite lead arrangement. This is why reversing the plug may sound better one way than the other. To test for this, disconnect the PC ground from the chassis. Power up, and measure the voltage between the disconnected PC ground line and chassis. Shut off, reverse transformer leads, and measure voltage between the disconnected PC ground line and chassis again. The transformer connection having the lowest voltage between the chassis and the ground line is the one to use, because less leakage will flow to ground.
Hard to say if the best arrangement was done when amps were made, but perhaps putting the amps on differently phased circuits caused the leakage currents to add.
I'm not entirely confident of this is the entire reason for the noise. It could also be from one circuit being a loop coupled to the other via the ground line. There's no way of telling without going through the process of elimination.
Thanks Al. This stuff gets pretty heavy for me, it's taking time for me to understant fully, but this explanation helps a ton.
I have a chassis ground point on the balanced power unit. How does this work? I saw in that Jensen paper that the solution was to run grounds off the chassis? is this done w/ just a bare copper wire that ties into a piece of grounded metal (not sure what i have available that i could use)...?
There are two approaches to equipment grounding: "star" and "daisy chain." In a star grounding scheme, there is one ground reference point and all the equipment is connected to it with individual wires. In a circuit diagram, this looks like a star. As long as there are no other pathways to couple the grounds together between pieces of equipment, this is the best method. However, most audio equipment has some internal connection of audio zero reference to AC safety-earth. The interconnect cables complete the ground loops as I described above, regardless of whether the equipment is star-grounded to the power distribution point.
"Daisy chain" grounding is the lazy way, and almost guarantees trouble.
Your BP device may have the chassis ground point to allow a star-ground setup for equipment connected to it. However, this would have to be done in conjunction with some method of interrupting the audio zero reference connections somewhere. Some equipment includes "ground lift" switches. These switches break the connection of audio zero reference to AC safety-earth inside the equipment. Another approach is to use signal transformers to break the audio zero reference connection between pieces of equipment.
Don't add ground wires to equipment that already has three-wire AC plugs. These additional ground wires create additional ground loops.
assuming the amp is grounded as you described, if the source's audio zero reference is not terminated to safety-earth ground point on the source's chassis (all wood), but the source component nevertheless has a 3-prong IEC with ground blade referenced to safety earth bolt in chassis to which only ground wires from EI transformers are terminated...would the potential still exist for ground loop?
In this example, the source is a dac housed in wood chassis connected to upstream transport that has audio zero reference tied to safety earth ground.
Thanks ~ Mike
The DAC by itself would break the ground loop as long as the DAC's power supply output is isolated from the AC safety-earth. However, if the audio zero reference (DAC output) is continuous with the digital zero reference (DAC input), then the AC safety-earth connection in the transport would complete the ground loop. I don't know: I wouldn't mix digital and audio zero references, but I don't have experience with DAC design.
Everything should be plugged into the BPT.
Alan
so how much capacity do i need to do this if the amps are 320W RMS each?
IME plugging your amps into the BPT can cause a thinning of the sound. I had a BPT 2.5 Signature that I used with a number of amps, and always ended up running the amps directly into the wall because I was unhappy with their performance when plugged into the BPT. I replaced the BPT with a new Power Plant Premier and the transformation was wondrous; amps are plugged into the PPP with none of the problems with the BPT.
John K.
Maybe the "thinning" was due to less noise?? Put your hand on your woofers when nothing is playing to see if they are moving. If there is any motion felt, you have noise.
John...one of my custom BPT units or Chris unit? Our version never thin out the sound quality. The custom unit had a meaty kind of sound quality.
Alan
Hi.
If it was, say 700W (typical power rating for a 320RMS amp), so two amps will be 2x700W = 1,400W.
I would specify a minimum 5KVA (min 5 times the rated power supply for your amps) isolation BPT.
But don't hold you breath yet - not many powerline transformers do not
impair the sonics of your system. This is my bitter costly experience.
c-J
I tell people to expect 40% of the transformer max to be released as heat. To answer that question I would need to know your system specs and the model BPT unit.
Alan
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: