Shady Lane

RE: I think you're being unreasonable - Yep!

64.121.50.39

Cpk

In Reply to: RE: I think you're being unreasonable posted by badman on August 08, 2011 at 09:44:12

it is not going to get 'lost' intransit if you have it tracked and it's already damaged/DOA. Send it back and get refunded, if it bothers you that you feel she was knowingly sold you something DOA then I think you have to give her the benefit of the doubt and then just don't leave a feedback.

Edits: 08/08/11

Follow Ups:

RE: I think you're being unreasonable - Yep! - RedGrant 18:38:52 08/08/11 (0)
"...and it's already damaged/DOA."

....but cosmetics are fine, no cracked glass or damaged corners.

"..... if it bothers you that you feel she was knowingly sold you something DOA then I think you have to give her the benefit of the doubt and then just don't leave a feedback."

That is good reasoning, thanks, that's what I am going to do, just leave no feedback.
RE: I think you're being unreasonable - Yep! - volunteer 12:24:53 08/08/11 (7)
+2 you are being unreasonable. She offered to make you whole and deserves nothing less than positive feedback. It's a trivial amount of money considering she paid for shipping. I suggest a little perspective.

-Wendell
- ....it's about principle............ - RedGrant 18:34:39 08/08/11 (6)
  "She offered to make you whole and deserves nothing less than positive feedback."
  
  What if she knowingly sold doa as fully tested and working?
  
  "It's a trivial amount of money considering she paid for shipping. I suggest a little perspective."
  
  She didn't pay for shipping, I did, what are you talking about? You meant her offer of reimbursement?
  - RE: ....it's about principle............ - volunteer 19:07:28 08/08/11 (5)
    You have no way of knowing if she is lying. You asked for opinions. You are free to accept or reject any and all that are offered.
    
    You original post stated the price as delivered which I read to include shipping. Perhaps I'm mistaken.
    
    -Wendell
    - ...and you have no way of knowing if she's telling.... - RedGrant 20:49:08 08/08/11 (4)
      ...the truth, and knowingly sold doa as fully tested and working.
      
      So how can you believe she deserves nothing but positive feedback?
      
      "You asked for opinions."
      
      I did, and your reasoning behind your opinion is flawed in that you believe she deserves nothing but positive feedback simply on the virtue of the fact that I have no way of knowing whether she intnetionally sold me doa as fully tested and working and she is offering to reimburse my purchase price and shipping.........but......
      
      .....not counting the possibility that she might have sold doa as fully tested and working.
      
      "You are free to accept or reject any and all that are offered."
      
      That has never been the issue, so why bring it up?
      
      "You original post stated the price as delivered which I read to include shipping. Perhaps I'm mistaken."
      
      Buyer always pay for the shipping even when sellers offers 'free shipping'.
      - RE: ...and you have no way of knowing if she's telling.... - volunteer 06:51:30 08/09/11 (3)
        
        In Reply to: RE: ...and you have no way of knowing if she's telling.... posted by RedGrant on August 08, 2011 at 20:49:08
        
        You're correct, I don't know. That's why she deserves the benefit of doubt.
        
        -Wendell
        
        ....giving benefit of doubt doesn't necessarily.......... - RedGrant 11:07:19 08/09/11 (2)
        
        In Reply to: RE: ...and you have no way of knowing if she's telling.... posted by volunteer on August 09, 2011 at 06:51:30
        
        .....mean giving positive feedback when in doubt of her integrity.
        
        Better way of giving benefit of doubt in this case would be no feedback.
        
        If she manages the problem right - badman 08:36:02 08/11/11 (1)
        
        In Reply to: RE: ....giving benefit of doubt doesn't necessarily.......... posted by RedGrant on August 09, 2011 at 11:07:19
        
        then you should leave a positive. As I initially stated. Rattling is bad for gear but doesn't damage the outer structure.
        
        Bass is supposed to sound big. 6.5" is not a woofer size.
        
        What do you mean if she manages it right? - RedGrant 05:59:04 08/14/11 (0)
        
        In Reply to: RE: If she manages the problem right posted by badman on August 11, 2011 at 08:36:02
        
        ....there is nothing she can do now. It doesn't turn on, period, and she had said it was fully tested and working.
        
        "As I initially stated. Rattling is bad for gear...."
        
        I agree on the rattling part, when it comes to transport, that's why I said I am willing to give benefit of doubt when it comes to transport. Actually I 'forgave' 4 different sellers over the last 5 years when it came to transport not working as they claimed. I didn't even make an issue out of it.
        
        "... but doesn't damage the outer structure."
        
        I disagree on this one. Rattling can damage glass part of the outer shell very easily. I've had one BC8004, 2 BC5000s damaged due to rattling, and no, I didn't blame the seller on those.

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

McShane Design