Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
135.131.188.17
In Reply to: RE: Disagree posted by E-Stat on December 11, 2024 at 15:38:36
Guess you didn't have them set up correctly as my experiences have been just the opposite. Proper room treatment and dsp is a game changer. No need for $50K speakers with $2000 in room treatment and dsp. My observations have everything to do with price.
Follow Ups:
and when? Perhaps you didn't hear the Sound Labs properly set up. ;)
The quality of parts used throughout reflects the budget. Also, note that Acoustat used rugged, but thick 17 micron diaphragms vs. 2.5 for Sound Lab products. From a practical standpoint, however, one brand is long dead while the other is very much alive. Good luck finding replacement transformers for Acoustat products today.
It's true I use a modicum of room treatments to achieve rather linear response in the Schroeder frequencies. Pics found in my gallery.
I don't recall specific model numbers but at least 3-4 different models over the last 10 years.
Yeah, it's possible they weren't set up optimally. That doesn't change the price/performance metric. No doubt they sound great. They should for their price. They should do the laundry and wash the dishes too for $50K.
Acoustats are indeed rugged. Many are still in service after 30-40 years. Transformers can be ordered. I could probably get a freight car full for the cost of the Sound Labs.
Room treatments only get one so far as you have noted.
Got it.That doesn't change the price/performance metric.
Exactly. You simply cannot find any Acoustat at the same level of performance. The large Sound Lab models are not intended as a "budget" solution. Folks like me were interested in better. :)
Room treatments only get one so far as you have noted.
Kindly quote the text that gave you that incorrect impression. I use what's necessary to effectively take the room out of the equation. Without adding unnecessary processing into the signal path.
Diffusion addresses room challenges DSP cannot.
BTW, kindly reference the source of replacement Acoustat transformers. Should another fail with mine, that could be useful information. The one I obtained was from former Acoustat engineer Roy Esposito who also updated my interfaces ten years ago with his "Air Mod" that bypasses the wire wound rheostat at the top. Alas, he has retired.
Edits: 12/11/24 12/11/24
I did answer the question, just not to your satisfaction apparently.
Obviously in my opinion I have found an Acoustat at the same level of performance and at a fraction of the cost. Speak for yourself. And by the way, what is your metric for performance? Why does it seem like you are simply touting your personal, biased, subjective opinion and acting like this "performance" is an objective fact? Who wouldn't pay $$$$$ for something and not think it's the best thing around? Sorry, but your opinion means nothing to me.
Your said you treat up to the Schroeder frequency. That's a limit dsp doesn't have. You haven't taken the room out of the equation. Perhaps your decreased hearing ability at higher frequencies makes further correction unnecessary.
Yes, cranky Roy retired. The new guy knows where to order transformers.
Mine covered one.
And by the way, what is your metric for performance?
Faithfulness to live, unamplified music. Transparency. Tonal balance. Freedom from beaming.
Who wouldn't pay $$$$$ for something and not think it's the best thing around?
Perhaps you buy stuff before auditioning and hope for the best. LOL!
The new guy knows where to order transformers.
So, you are still speculating. Got it!
"Faithfulness to live, unamplified music. Transparency. Tonal balance. Freedom from beaming."
Those aren't metrics, they're subjective impressions. Like I said, you are just sharing your personal opinion, which isn't fact and will differ depending on the listener. You are free to think your overpriced speakers are the best thing in the world, and I am sure for you and others who bought them, they are. As I said, I have heard several models over the years and in my opinion, the Acoustat 6600, with dsp, are preferable. Not everyone shares your opinion. Get over it.
I have spoken with Mike, the new guy, on several occasions. He tells me he can get new transformers. He's a few hours away. I have no reason to not believe him. He has worked on radio telescopes for 30 years. He knows what he's doing. Look him up and ask him before assuming I am speculating.
Hours away from where?
If comes as no surprise you're not very detail oriented. :)
It comes as no surprise that you are too lazy to do your own homework. Try google- it's an internet search engine many find useful.
the helpful community spirit!
nt
OK guys, enough is enough. 'Tis the season and all. I'm still trying to sell my 1.6 QRS pair which brought me a couple of decades worth of listening pleasure.
Merry Christmas - Happy Hanukka - May Festivus reign!
whiners are not very helpful.
Good luck on your sale!
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: