![]() |
Vinyl Asylum Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Technically, do you need more antiskate for 45 rpm records? posted by George S. Roland on January 16, 2025 at 13:55:16:
I owned the original AR turntable and I remember Villchur making those remarks. He was wrong. Indeed the skating force is small, but it is big enough to matter. I went from the AR turntable to one with antiskating, but used the same cartridge. With no antiskating force applied the new TT sound very similar to the AR. With antiskating force applied the new TT sounded noticeably better than the AR with lower distortion (as heard through AR 3 speakers i might add). I have a test record that I used to set the force. If it's too low you hear distortion from one channel, with it too high you hear it from the other channel. When it's just right you hear no distortion. It's not subtle.
The only major things that matters in the skating force are the friction of the stylus in the groove and how much the direction of that frictional force misses the bearing of the tonearm. Wiith offset headshells the direction of the frictional force does not pass through the pivot, resulting in a torque about the pivot. That torque can change across the record because of geometry changes, but it isn't a great change, so some average or typical antiskate force works reasonably well across the record. The amount of the frictional force can also vary according to how loud the music is, as a heavily modulated groove will in principle produce a higher drag than a low modulation one. I suspect this effect is extremely small and of no consequence, though I've never seen a measurement of it and haven't had the time or energy to calculate it theoretically from physical principles.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You really do need antiskate compensation for the best sound. - jsm 16:48:54 01/27/25 (0)