![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: "He has your number." He has blatantly lied. Hey everyone! Take a look at my so-called "number". posted by clarkjohnsen on July 9, 2007 at 10:31:29:
Look at your actions and replies. No answers, no solutions other than "try reversing your leads and see what you like." You have smeared everyone who has attempted to help your "cause", berating them but at the same time refusing to commit yourself. Perhaps you like screaming into the night, and you certainly seem to have isolated yourself from the vast majority of members, both those who hear polarity issues and those who do not. You simply sidestep any serious inquiry by complaining about persecution, dogging any concise answers.
We still are awaiting, with bated breath, your definition of correct polarity, or perhaps what you are saying is that there is no correct polarity. If so, then polarity is a non issue and you need not waste any more bandwidth upon the subject.
Those who endeavor to engage in honest research and ask serious questions, receive one liners and insults. Just look at your treatment of Truthseekerprime, who is on to something and has spent serious thought on the issues. He even admitted to an error in his statements, and publicly admitted it.
If you wish to to be a literal one man band, so be it, but do not carp on the subject without enlightening us mere mortals with at least some tangible knowledge. Any other action would be akin to pissing into the wind.
We await your definition, as that would be a very good first step. One would like to believe after two decades of thought on the subject, you ought to have a nice concise definition, especially since no one else seems to have one.
Stu
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I would submit the following: - unclestu52 10:34:11 07/10/07 (5)
- Just more lies here, folks. Let's move forward. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:11:05 07/11/07 (1)
- Typical avoidance , how predictable ! - unclestu52 22:26:41 07/11/07 (0)
- "or perhaps what you are saying is that there is no correct polarity" - geoffkait 05:33:35 07/11/07 (2)
- Addendum - unclestu52 22:07:02 07/15/07 (0)
- RE: "or perhaps what you are saying is that there is no correct polarity" - unclestu52 22:32:51 07/11/07 (0)