![]() |
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: A mild-mannered question gets an obnoxious response? That's you! nt posted by clarkjohnsen on July 6, 2007 at 08:51:01:
... you've been cluttering up AA for quite a while. Meant, one assumes, to reassert your primacy in the polarity area in the face of various attempts to simplify or illuminate the matter and make useful sense of it. You will tell us, no doubt, that it is impossible to actually define "normal" and "inverted" (or whatever) polarity and so we should pretty much give it up and look to the master for whatever grudging guidance might be forthcoming. Please, please prove me wrong :-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- It's the same "mild-mannered question" with which ... - Dave Pogue 09:05:52 07/06/07 (9)
- Your odious remarks would be worthy of censure... - clarkjohnsen 08:42:25 07/09/07 (8)
- I refer you to unclestu52's remarks above - Dave Pogue 09:12:30 07/09/07 (7)
- "He has your number." He has blatantly lied. Hey everyone! Take a look at my so-called "number". - clarkjohnsen 10:31:29 07/09/07 (6)
- I would submit the following: - unclestu52 10:34:11 07/10/07 (5)
- Just more lies here, folks. Let's move forward. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:11:05 07/11/07 (1)
- Typical avoidance , how predictable ! - unclestu52 22:26:41 07/11/07 (0)
- "or perhaps what you are saying is that there is no correct polarity" - geoffkait 05:33:35 07/11/07 (2)
- Addendum - unclestu52 22:07:02 07/15/07 (0)
- RE: "or perhaps what you are saying is that there is no correct polarity" - unclestu52 22:32:51 07/11/07 (0)