![]() |
Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
|
In Reply to: Re: Where did the term 'tube rollling' come from? posted by Steve O on February 2, 2007 at 15:39:00:
"David claimed that his designs were highly optimized for a certain output tube type and really no other and therefore the sound of his designs was better than that of Roger's."Seems a strange claim for Manley to make. As I understand it, he was notorious for misusing tubes by exceeding maximum ratings.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Where did the term 'tube rollling' come from? - Ray Moth 16:58:53 02/02/07 (10)
- Re: Where did the term 'tube rollling' come from? - Steve O 20:02:34 02/02/07 (0)
- d'ya think RM drives EL84's too hard!? - Timbo in Oz 17:53:07 02/02/07 (8)
- Re: d'ya think RM drives EL84's too hard!? - Ray Moth 14:40:21 02/03/07 (3)
- well I currently get 20 watts @ 20 hz (.5%) and through to 20khz @( .1% thd - Timbo in Oz 17:47:50 02/05/07 (2)
- Re: well I currently get 20 watts @ 20 hz (.5%) and through to 20khz @( .1% thd - Ray Moth 03:43:34 02/14/07 (1)
- The values around the ip and drivers were changed - Timbo in Oz 14:47:49 02/14/07 (0)
- Re: d'ya think RM drives EL84's too hard!? - Tre' 18:41:10 02/02/07 (3)
- I LIKE power!, and I was asking a technical question of Ray. - Timbo in Oz 19:03:19 02/02/07 (2)
- I'm not sure of the question but I have some comments - Russ57 06:14:27 02/03/07 (1)
- See above under Ray Moths' post, too - Timbo in Oz 17:50:26 02/05/07 (0)