I'm not sure of the question but I have some comments

Posted by Russ57 (A) on February 3, 2007 at 06:14:27

In Reply to: I LIKE power!, and I was asking a technical question of Ray. posted by Timbo in Oz on February 2, 2007 at 19:03:19:

[AFAIK PP CCS'd EL84M's/7189 IE A1, are gonna struggle to dissipate 20 watts in pure A - continuously - as at idle, even in pentode mode*.]

The 7189 is rated at 12 watts anode and another 2 watts for the G2. So a total of 28 watts for a pair of tubes. A CCS in the common cathode circuit set for 20ma would therefore not be a problem if the B+ isn't too high.

[And, so long as I have a watt or three of A in AB1 I'll be happy.]

I doubt you will feel that way once you go to real class A amplification. Especially when in pentode a tube is very critical as to the best load. When in class A the tube sees half the plate to plate load but when it moves to class B it suddenly sees only a 1/4 of the plate to plate load. Not good for a pentode. THD will be many times higher and you can dang sure hear the difference.

[Especially if fixed bias, were used, so I could adjust over the power tubes life.]

If anything fixed bias allows wider current variations through the tubes

[With fixed (adjustable) bias for each PP tube I think we'd be getting pdclose to SE sound, anyway!]

I don't understand why you thing a pentode class AB1 stage is going to sound like a class A1 SE stage stage simply because of fixed bias.

[MY spkrs are 91db/w, and an EASY 8 ohm load, I'd just like more reliability, AND a little more headroom!]

Yes, you do have to take the speakers into account.

[I would need to upgrade the power trannie anyway - for the 'CCS'd pure diff'l opt stage' route, to be worth doing - as I don't want to LOSE power, either!]

No, there is simply no way to have the same power in class A as you can in class AB. There is no need to change the PT and nothing would be gained. If anything class A would usually be run at lower voltage and higher current. A small first cap followed by a choke can make this happen and then the PT could deliver more current.

[*I don't even KNOW what continuous output the OPTxers could cope with.]

In class A the output power will be lower and the OPT's will have less to cope with. The CCS on the output tubes (if done right) will force perfect AC balance something no other method can do. You could still use a little fixed bias to adjust for equal standing bias.

Russ

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Where did the term 'tube rollling' come from? - arahl 14:07:05 02/02/07 (13)

Re: Where did the term 'tube rollling' come from? - Steve O 15:39:00 02/02/07 (12)

I thought "rolling" and "scoring" were drugs argot - andy evans 14:56:09 02/05/07 (0)

Re: Where did the term 'tube rollling' come from? - Ray Moth 16:58:53 02/02/07 (10)

Re: Where did the term 'tube rollling' come from? - Steve O 20:02:34 02/02/07 (0)

d'ya think RM drives EL84's too hard!? - Timbo in Oz 17:53:07 02/02/07 (8)

Re: d'ya think RM drives EL84's too hard!? - Ray Moth 14:40:21 02/03/07 (3)

well I currently get 20 watts @ 20 hz (.5%) and through to 20khz @( .1% thd - Timbo in Oz 17:47:50 02/05/07 (2)

Re: well I currently get 20 watts @ 20 hz (.5%) and through to 20khz @( .1% thd - Ray Moth 03:43:34 02/14/07 (1)

The values around the ip and drivers were changed - Timbo in Oz 14:47:49 02/14/07 (0)

Re: d'ya think RM drives EL84's too hard!? - Tre' 18:41:10 02/02/07 (3)

I LIKE power!, and I was asking a technical question of Ray. - Timbo in Oz 19:03:19 02/02/07 (2)

I'm not sure of the question but I have some comments - Russ57 06:14:27 02/03/07 (1)

See above under Ray Moths' post, too - Timbo in Oz 17:50:26 02/05/07 (0)

Follow Ups

I'm not sure of the question but I have some comments - Russ57 06:14:27 02/03/07 (1)

See above under Ray Moths' post, too - Timbo in Oz 17:50:26 02/05/07 (0)

You can not post to an archived thread.