In Reply to: I think that would raise some liability issues for the owners posted by Frihed89 on August 5, 2007 at 07:22:04:
from current practices vis-a-vis liability? On the other hand, if an inmate was acting maliciously and not in good faith, wouldn't the inmate's action be libelous? I'm just asking, because I'm not an attorney nor an expert on this.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- If Asylum inmates do the posting, then how would it be any different - Jay Buridan 08:53:02 08/05/07 (6)
- Me neither - Frihed89 00:06:40 08/06/07 (5)
- RE: who wants the hassle? - Bruce from DC 08:55:07 08/06/07 (4)
- Not merely false, but knowingly false, makes it defamation - Jay Buridan 16:02:47 08/06/07 (3)
- No, even unknowingly false is defamation in most instances - JoshT 14:23:41 08/07/07 (2)
- RE: No, even unknowingly false is defamation in most instances - Bruce from DC 15:41:35 08/07/07 (1)
- I see . . . - JoshT 16:12:28 08/07/07 (0)