In Reply to: RE: "Both of you resort to name calling." Beg your pardon? posted by Len_ on July 24, 2007 at 13:02:12:
...my regular antagonist. Geez Luiz.
"If it makes you feel more self-important to think of me as a stalker, so be it." Again, missed by a long shot.
"Your declaration of having other 'admirers' really is truly telling of your ego." This remark shows you're immune to irony.
"Who are these 'many' you refer to? I count you and Wellfed." They were enumerated earlier.
"I don't care to support any majority claim as it's Bandwagon fallacy." Hoo boy! I might have this wrong, but weren't you the first (forget Hillary) to utter the phrase, "vast majority"? By golly, you were! This is just like when you accused me of "disctioary" "defining" and I had done no such thing, the word was all yours.
"Geoff violated my intellectual property." I see the "knowingly" has now been omitted; change noted.
"How do you gloss over this and choose to attack me instead?" Never glossed, simply called it a petty mistake for which you needn't have gone public and have *continued the discussion* once it became apparent there were geoff bashers clinging to you.
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "You've accused me of being stalker." I did not! That was the other guy... - clarkjohnsen 13:24:02 07/24/07 (16)
- RE: "You've accused me of being stalker." I did not! That was the other guy... - Len_ 13:52:39 07/24/07 (15)
- So I "refuse to abide by the rules of logical engagement"? But you're the one who... - clarkjohnsen 08:45:41 07/25/07 (2)
- RE: So I "refuse to abide by the rules of logical engagement"? But you're the one who... - Len_ 10:02:40 07/25/07 (1)
- Hell knows no fury like a little man scorned. [nt] - Wellfed 11:32:52 07/25/07 (0)
- Was it logical to characterize MD's springs as being of inferior quality?... - Wellfed 14:04:38 07/24/07 (11)
- RE: Was it logical to characterize MD's springs as being of inferior quality?... - Len_ 14:13:37 07/24/07 (10)
- Normally people don't call disagreements tantrums either. [nt] - Wellfed 14:19:10 07/24/07 (9)
- RE: Normally people don't call disagreements tantrums either. [nt] - Len_ 14:27:40 07/24/07 (8)
- Your complaint has been not "a whine", but petty from post #1. - clarkjohnsen 08:20:01 07/25/07 (7)
- RE: Your complaint has been not "a whine", but petty from post #1. - Len_ 09:51:23 07/25/07 (2)
- RE: Your complaint has been not "a whine", but petty from post #1. - sjb 08:38:25 07/26/07 (1)
- RE: Your complaint has been not "a whine", but petty from post #1. - Len_ 09:42:28 07/26/07 (0)
- Two wrongs don't make a right... - AOK_Farmer 09:32:33 07/25/07 (3)
- You know, you said that... - AOK_Farmer 15:43:15 07/25/07 (1)
- RE: You know, you said that... - Len_ 15:46:01 07/25/07 (0)
- Uh... nt - clarkjohnsen 09:35:34 07/25/07 (0)