In Reply to: RE: But he DID notice the Stalker Alerts. To those, he's very sensitive. Wonder why? nt posted by Len_ on July 24, 2007 at 12:16:10:
What names did I call you? Or for that matter, that person (There's a name! "Mom, he called me a person!") who's been stalking me for years, with whose exertions you're apparently unacquainted.
Stalking is an activity practiced by someone who first targets his quarry, then steps into a discussion in which he has not otherwise participated, or very little, in order to insult another. You'll find, should you care to check, that I have several such, ah... admirers. And that their, ah... contributions have frequently been excised by the moderators. That's not "paranoia", that's fact. My own plea, often expressed, is that the posts be left -- as examples of stalker fury. And fury is exactly why I said there's no ammo in his tube, it's only pure spite.
So: Is it still "a vast majority"? (Not!...)
And are you proud of the fact that in your efforts to denigrate the provider of an item that didn't happen to work for you, you took a small what-should-have-been-private issue to the boards?
And are you surprised that many saw right through the charade?
Just wonderin'...
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "Both of you resort to name calling." Beg your pardon? - clarkjohnsen 12:36:50 07/24/07 (24)
- Your stalker was kinda disturbing how he bubbled up from the ether - AOK_Farmer 18:38:53 07/24/07 (3)
- Considering you've posted 10 times, with..... - Rick W 10:19:10 07/25/07 (1)
- Champagne anyone? - AOK_Farmer 15:55:47 07/25/07 (0)
- You're very kind... I think... nt - clarkjohnsen 08:15:52 07/25/07 (0)
- RE: "Both of you resort to name calling." Beg your pardon? - Len_ 13:02:12 07/24/07 (17)
- "You've accused me of being stalker." I did not! That was the other guy... - clarkjohnsen 13:24:02 07/24/07 (16)
- RE: "You've accused me of being stalker." I did not! That was the other guy... - Len_ 13:52:39 07/24/07 (15)
- So I "refuse to abide by the rules of logical engagement"? But you're the one who... - clarkjohnsen 08:45:41 07/25/07 (2)
- RE: So I "refuse to abide by the rules of logical engagement"? But you're the one who... - Len_ 10:02:40 07/25/07 (1)
- Hell knows no fury like a little man scorned. [nt] - Wellfed 11:32:52 07/25/07 (0)
- Was it logical to characterize MD's springs as being of inferior quality?... - Wellfed 14:04:38 07/24/07 (11)
- RE: Was it logical to characterize MD's springs as being of inferior quality?... - Len_ 14:13:37 07/24/07 (10)
- Normally people don't call disagreements tantrums either. [nt] - Wellfed 14:19:10 07/24/07 (9)
- RE: Normally people don't call disagreements tantrums either. [nt] - Len_ 14:27:40 07/24/07 (8)
- Your complaint has been not "a whine", but petty from post #1. - clarkjohnsen 08:20:01 07/25/07 (7)
- RE: Your complaint has been not "a whine", but petty from post #1. - Len_ 09:51:23 07/25/07 (2)
- RE: Your complaint has been not "a whine", but petty from post #1. - sjb 08:38:25 07/26/07 (1)
- RE: Your complaint has been not "a whine", but petty from post #1. - Len_ 09:42:28 07/26/07 (0)
- Two wrongs don't make a right... - AOK_Farmer 09:32:33 07/25/07 (3)
- You know, you said that... - AOK_Farmer 15:43:15 07/25/07 (1)
- RE: You know, you said that... - Len_ 15:46:01 07/25/07 (0)
- Uh... nt - clarkjohnsen 09:35:34 07/25/07 (0)
- We saw through Len_'s charade... - Wellfed 12:44:18 07/24/07 (1)
- "Why wasn't everyone so lucky?" They are possessed of an animus. Or, anima (Jung). nt - clarkjohnsen 12:55:38 07/24/07 (0)