In Reply to: Re: One thought posted by Soundmind on August 26, 2004 at 11:46:32:
at least on the points I posted earlier.When I suggested a weighting scheme I wasn't thinking in terms of ranking one audible effect against another.
I was thinking in terms of weighting different technical deviations in terms of their audibility. In other words, does a 1% change in one parameter have the same magnitude of effect as a 0.00001% change in another parameter.
So....do you are agree or disagree?
I'm not sure where you got the impression that I think we can never get to the bottom of this. My original post merely pointed out that the simple measurements posted at AH do not represent a successful end point because they cannot be correlated with audibility.
I do agree that we view the road forward in opposite terms. I want to come back to that in another post.
Peter
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I think we agreed more than you think - Commuteman 12:28:21 08/26/04 (6)
- Re: I think we agreed more than you think - Soundmind 12:44:00 08/26/04 (5)
- Ok, I've read this post a bunch of times.... - Commuteman 22:22:04 09/01/04 (0)
- Re: I think we agreed more than you think - john curl 16:23:15 08/26/04 (0)
- I can't help it, one more question.... :-) - Commuteman 13:57:58 08/26/04 (0)
- Well, I tried... - Commuteman 12:51:55 08/26/04 (1)
- Re: Well, I tried... - Soundmind 12:56:44 08/26/04 (0)