In Reply to: OK, guys, you may rip me for this -- My new column on good (audio) taste posted by clarkjohnsen on October 7, 2003 at 07:43:33:
The audiophile who thinks "I know what I hear" is likely to be wrong because sometimes his expectations will bias his perceptions.
I don't know about you, but I don't need to know, or want to know, the brand and model of an audio component before judging its sound quality. And I don't assume every component will sound different just because golden ears claim that is so (I think their egos get in the way of objective thinking).This thought applies to food also -- no wine taster who knows the brand/vintage he's tasting before giving an opinion will ever be taken seriously by me.
If you had an editor to delete the sarcastic sentences such as:
"Mr. Johnsen, we are not aware of any properly-conducted double-blind tests, published in a reputable peer-reviewed journal, that support your conclusions.", your article would be more interesting.In the past 20 years I have had many experiences with golden ears and other audiophiles making comments about components whose identity was hidden. After those experiences, when I hear or read of audiophiles claiming: "I know what I hear", I can't help laughing.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- But do we have to read it before we start insulting you ? - Richard BassNut Greene 13:11:57 10/09/03 (2)
- Gosh! One sentence ruins a whole article for you? - clarkjohnsen 10:34:36 10/10/03 (0)
- Re: But do we have to read it before we start insulting you ? - feet's too big 18:41:40 10/09/03 (0)