In Reply to: Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. posted by john curl on June 8, 2003 at 08:52:26:
It is a given, in any audio testing, that we use clean, similar contacts.There's more than just the connector-to-connector contact involved. There's also the wire-to-connector contacts to be considered as well.
One problem that I did have was trying to use a mumetal shield, that actually contributed some distortion, so I removed it.
Have you measured and compared the Radio Shack cables both with and without the steel spring strain reliefs? Steel is magnetic as well and has a larger hysteresis loop than MuMetal which should result in greater non-linearity (i.e. distortion) than MuMetal.
Also, what have you done to account for the nickel barrier plating used on most gold plated connectors? Nickel is ferromagnetic as well and will also exhibit distortion due to hysteresis. And while the barrier plating is rather thin, it's enough that my neodymium iron born magnets will stick to such connectors with enough strength to support the weight of all four of them.
Hmmmm. Here's an interesting observation. I was just trying the magnets out on some 2" 6-32 stainless steel socket head cap screws I have here. There's about a 7/8" section between the head and the threads that's just a straight smooth rod. The magnets will not stick to that section, but will readily stick to both the head and the threaded section.
Odd.
This hasn't anything to do with the current topic. Just happened to notice it while I was writing this and thought it worth mentioning.
se
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - Steve Eddy 10:00:01 06/08/03 (35)
- Hi Steve.. - jneutron 07:02:51 06/09/03 (0)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - john curl 15:19:09 06/08/03 (31)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - john curl 22:29:57 06/08/03 (0)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - john curl 22:22:12 06/08/03 (28)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - Steve Eddy 23:57:14 06/08/03 (27)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - john curl 01:06:25 06/09/03 (25)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - Steve Eddy 09:49:38 06/09/03 (24)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - john curl 10:44:03 06/09/03 (23)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - john curl 15:49:23 06/09/03 (21)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - Steve Eddy 16:35:25 06/09/03 (20)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - john curl 18:02:06 06/09/03 (19)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - Steve Eddy 19:01:12 06/09/03 (18)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - john curl 21:33:37 06/09/03 (17)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - Steve Eddy 21:56:59 06/09/03 (16)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - john curl 00:56:09 06/10/03 (15)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - Steve Eddy 11:11:43 06/10/03 (13)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - john curl 15:06:35 06/10/03 (0)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - john curl 14:30:29 06/10/03 (11)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - Steve Eddy 15:52:01 06/10/03 (10)
- This is depressing... - Charles Hansen 07:58:42 06/11/03 (9)
- Re: This is depressing... - john curl 00:11:00 06/12/03 (0)
- Re: This is depressing... - Steve Eddy 10:52:27 06/11/03 (1)
- Huh? - Charles Hansen 13:05:23 06/11/03 (0)
- I don't know who you are either... - Monstrous Mike 10:44:59 06/11/03 (4)
- Charles Hansen - Manufacturer, Ayre Acoustics, Inc. - Leisure7 12:42:45 06/11/03 (3)
- Re: Charles Hansen - Manufacturer, Ayre Acoustics, Inc. - Monstrous Mike 09:15:15 06/12/03 (0)
- Re: Charles Hansen - Manufacturer, Ayre Acoustics, Inc. - Steve Eddy 12:56:00 06/11/03 (1)
- Agree - Leisure7 15:42:32 06/12/03 (0)
- No, I don't think so..There are relevant, unanswered questions.. - jneutron 09:06:48 06/11/03 (0)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - john curl 09:38:32 06/10/03 (0)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - Steve Eddy 12:07:00 06/09/03 (0)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - john curl 01:06:08 06/09/03 (0)
- Re: John, you were sucker-punched, then piled on, by the Usual Suspects. - Steve Eddy 18:24:20 06/08/03 (0)
- I need to get me some of those magnets... - Leisure7 12:21:17 06/08/03 (1)
- Re: I need to get me some of those magnets... - Steve Eddy 14:19:34 06/08/03 (0)