|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: Give me a break, please. posted by cheap-Jack on May 25, 2007 at 13:55:32:
Don't forget: I never said don't use some other signal or that a sine wave is the only perfect choice. I only suggested a sine wave might be a better choice than some piece of music. It is still a true statement. The only reason I am even bothering challenge what you said at all is it's my belief that your statement is going overboard quite a bit. For a quick and dirty SPL test sine signals are perfectly adequate except in a small but statistically unlikely given sample set of random choices of arbitrarily chosen test signal frequencies. In other words you have to choose poorly but the good news is that is unlikely to happen in most circumstances. Consider also that in the case of some user with only a set of analog sources these fancier noise signals you speak of may be a lot more difficult to come by than sine waves.
"Do you have a clue what I am talking about?"
I understand that you are apparently assuming quite a bit about me and the OP and then using that stretch to try and bust my balls for something here.
Obviously the assumption you are making is that there will be either additive or destructive interference of the given test signal at all infinity test signal frequency possibilities at the measurment location and if some poor soul makes the grave error of choosing a sine wave as a test signal to measure SPL it will automatically yield completely bogus SPL measurement results. I just say that bogus results aren't very likely in most systems and this infinitely bad room you speak of is not even physically possible in the first place and therefore frequencies exist which would be considered good test signals. In my room and system especially after EQ you'd have trouble even finding a really bad test frequency signal to choose from since it has been a goal to trend my response toward flat. In other words just about any frequency you choose at my house would be as information rich,within a small margin of error of course, as any complex waveform to a fairly simple piece of measurement equipment like a SPL meter. For a quick and dirty measuement like those done via SPL meter this margin of error is going to be nearly completely negligible, again unless you're unlucky in your choice.
If for example one intelligently chose a sinewave frequency which is not a problem for this room/system and listening/measuring position and one merely cares about SPL's capabilities at a given volume knob position as would necissarily be the case if using a SPL meter since that is the output of that type of device and which by the way is what the OP was talking about, there is no more amplitude information available in pink noise, white noise or anything else over a pure sine wave.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Give me a break, please. - Ugly 17:45:07 05/25/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
