In Reply to: Re: what exactly is peter belt selling? posted by May Belt on April 14, 2007 at 10:37:48:
"Improvement" is in any case fairly meaningless, but I am curious to know the answer!I am guessing that over the years with all of your treatments there must have been dozens, probably hundreds of "improvements" noted by you and Peter.
Does this mean that the sound was totally horrible when you started (I am being facetious!)or that it is possible to have dozens of "improvements" in sound without finally exploding with extasy!
This sounds silly, perhaps, but it is a genuine question.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- How many cumulative "improvements" in sound have you noted? - clifff 11:01:23 04/14/07 (9)
- I know, it's only rock 'n roll... - Wellfed 12:14:51 04/14/07 (8)
- OK, so how would YOU answer that? - clifff 02:46:14 04/16/07 (7)
- I'm currently of the opinion that they are NOT finite... - Wellfed 08:36:37 04/16/07 (6)
- Interesting. - clifff 08:41:39 04/16/07 (5)
- Theoretically, yes/no... - Wellfed 08:53:25 04/16/07 (4)
- Is there similarly any limit on how well any musical instrument can sound? nt - clarkjohnsen 09:44:35 04/16/07 (3)
- Do you tweak your violin? - clifff 11:26:02 04/16/07 (2)
- I cryo'd my Stradivarius (NT) - tunenut 15:03:10 04/16/07 (1)
- Then crye'd into it, I shouldn't wonder ;-) nt - clifff 07:21:54 04/17/07 (0)