In Reply to: Re: SoZ posted by Steve Eddy on August 17, 2004 at 23:44:34:
active xover + SoZ= less problems because no passive filters with DCR?I did read the Zenlightenment,but i couldnt afford to run it!
,energy is currently 14c/kwhr and no sign of getting cheaper(theyd rather make money than invest in the countrys power grid),i keep my 1kw heater on 1/2 for only a few hours at nite in winter(light snow)yet our power bill is too much still!.....student life!
hugely inefficient amplifiers maynot be so useful for me for this reason, unless i want heat + music at the same time!
I think that a SoZ might well be worth it, i got some 19" rack cases with finned heatsinks covering the ENTIRE Top of it! which is about 2x the area on my dodgy '350w' plate amp
I photocopied the ELektor article today,il scan it sometime :-)
but yes its just an input buffer fet,constant current source fet and output in class A uses a 6v voltage regulator for gate voltageA dozen resistors,a dozen caps, BUZ72A and BS170 fets
Cheers!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- active xover + SoZ - toxicport.e 17:40:49 08/18/04 (4)
- Re: active xover + SoZ - Steve Eddy 21:31:36 08/19/04 (3)
- Schematic - toxicport.e 18:10:52 08/22/04 (2)
- Re: Schematic - Steve Eddy 18:58:47 08/22/04 (1)
- conclude - toxicport.e 20:31:40 08/23/04 (0)