In Reply to: Re: What are we here for? posted by ophth on October 29, 2003 at 22:44:40:
I object to ABX testing, because it doesn't work for me.
If you can't hear an improvement when you change a piece of audio equipment, you should leave it alone. But, if you and perhaps several others try something, and hear an improvement, especially under different conditions, then progress can be made.
I know, I know, how can I be sure that I REALLY heard a difference? Well, first, I DON'T want to 'improve' something, unless it really does change the sound quality, because it costs money to do so, both for me and anyone else. This keeps me in control of my listening opinions, but if I were to use ABX tests, virtually nothing would come out of it. Personally, I think the test, itself, is flawed. I have held this opinion since 1979, and nothing put forth since then has convinced me otherwise.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: What are we here for? - john curl 10:19:14 10/30/03 (28)
- ABX has a flaw, I agree. - ophth 12:35:07 10/30/03 (27)
- Re: ABX has a flaw, I agree. - john curl 10:07:30 10/31/03 (20)
- OK. - ophth 14:02:40 10/31/03 (19)
- Re: OK. - Ted Smith 14:16:20 10/31/03 (18)
- Re: OK. - john curl 17:09:15 10/31/03 (17)
- Any interest?? - ophth 13:36:38 11/04/03 (15)
- They aren't very sensitive (long) - JCA 15:33:02 11/04/03 (9)
- Re: They aren't very sensitive - I agree. - ophth 22:01:20 11/04/03 (7)
- The problem is the wrong question - Commuteman 10:18:02 11/05/03 (3)
- Re: The problem is the wrong question - ophth 12:22:47 11/05/03 (2)
- We're saying the same thing - Commuteman 12:31:06 11/05/03 (1)
- Re: We're saying the same thing - ophth 17:15:51 11/05/03 (0)
- Re: They aren't very sensitive - I agree. - JCA 03:55:00 11/05/03 (2)
- Nicely said. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:37:48 11/06/03 (0)
- Re: They aren't very sensitive - I agree. - john curl 10:01:45 11/05/03 (0)
- Re: They aren't very sensitive (long) - john curl 16:02:51 11/04/03 (0)
- Re: Any interest?? - Ted Smith 13:54:02 11/04/03 (4)
- Accounting for seredipidy - ophth 12:34:36 11/05/03 (3)
- Thanks, guys. nt - ophth 22:20:54 11/05/03 (0)
- Re: Accounting for seredipidy - Ted Smith 13:18:02 11/05/03 (0)
- Re: Accounting for seredipidy - JCA 13:13:43 11/05/03 (0)
- Re: OK. - ophth 21:10:36 10/31/03 (0)
- Re: ABX has a flaw, I agree. - okiemax 20:27:11 10/30/03 (5)
- Variation - ophth 08:04:53 10/31/03 (4)
- Re: Variation - okiemax 07:37:07 11/01/03 (3)
- Re: Variation - ophth 17:47:09 11/01/03 (2)
- I think you've nailed it - Commuteman 10:25:28 11/05/03 (1)
- Re: I think you've nailed it - ophth 12:31:19 11/05/03 (0)