In Reply to: I'm not trying to be an apologist for JJ, but posted by Ted Smith on June 17, 2006 at 12:52:40:
You may not be a JJ apologist, but you're respecting someone who I really think does not warrant it. (I personally don't care if you don't respect me.)In regard to the namecalling, saying that someone "doesn't have a grasp" of a subject matter is just as bad, in my humble opinion.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Hey Ted.... - Todd Krieger 13:21:54 06/17/06 (12)
- Re: Hey Ted.... - Ted Smith 13:33:44 06/17/06 (11)
- You Should Observe.... - Todd Krieger 13:43:41 06/17/06 (10)
- When you say: - real_jj 19:27:29 06/17/06 (0)
- I was trying to discus this with you in a reasonable manner. - Ted Smith 15:00:04 06/17/06 (8)
- Re: I was trying to discus this with you in a reasonable manner. - Todd Krieger 15:26:47 06/17/06 (7)
- I didn't say that you were trying to mislead people - Ted Smith 15:34:00 06/17/06 (6)
- Appreciate the Clarification..... - Todd Krieger 15:40:24 06/17/06 (5)
- Thanks - Ted Smith 16:02:50 06/17/06 (0)
- Dither and reconstruction are two things. - real_jj 15:47:46 06/17/06 (3)
- I Think I Get Your Gist.... - Todd Krieger 15:52:20 06/17/06 (2)
- Oh and there is no debate... - real_jj 19:29:00 06/17/06 (0)
- Not at all. - real_jj 16:03:32 06/17/06 (0)