In Reply to: Yes, cheap-Jack it's "crystal clear" posted by thetubeguy1954 on May 31, 2006 at 06:57:10:
I said his message was not clear.It is dishonest of you to claim, therefore, that I am disagreeing.
It is, furthermore, disingenious of you to argue that I'm "correcting Mr. Einstein".
And you know what? If it was about modern audio, yes, I'd cheerfully correct "Mr. Einstein". Audio wasn't his field. GR isn't mine.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Tubeguy lies again... - real_jj 09:55:30 05/31/06 (13)
- No, It's Real JJ who lies... - thetubeguy1954 11:58:48 05/31/06 (10)
- again, more lies, or is it utter incomprehension? - real_jj 12:03:18 05/31/06 (9)
- Real JJ again, more lies, or is it utter incomprehension? - thetubeguy1954 12:19:29 05/31/06 (8)
- You don't even quote yourself correctly! - Pat D 13:05:46 05/31/06 (4)
- Re: You don't even quote yourself correctly! - thetubeguy1954 05:44:35 06/01/06 (3)
- I understand quotations not long enough to indicate the meaning. - Pat D 07:31:23 06/01/06 (2)
- No, You're Just An Objectivist That Doesn't Want To Understand - thetubeguy1954 09:38:05 06/01/06 (1)
- Strange that you can't explain it if it's so "crystal clear" in its application to audio! - Pat D 13:05:53 06/01/06 (0)
- The decision is not binary... - real_jj 12:44:10 05/31/06 (2)
- U R Just WRONG - thetubeguy1954 06:53:53 06/01/06 (1)
- Then you'd better file that professional complaint - real_jj 09:51:10 06/01/06 (0)
- Can't anyone here spell "disingenuous"? - Dave Pogue 11:32:17 05/31/06 (1)
- I admit, my speling is atroshus. :) - real_jj 11:59:29 05/31/06 (0)