In Reply to: What? posted by soulfood on May 23, 2006 at 13:14:41:
One things for sure stereo two channel audio is old technology. I'm not going to deny that major engineering efforts have allowed many to enjoy so much more for so much less but these advancements are not heralded as major technological steps foward. How could they be it's still stereo pretty much the same as it was 40 years ago.My point is that so-called audio experts who are spouting the new improved technologies bringing significant improvements to 2-channel audio are simply whistling dixie or more bluntly FOS. And other than the quality improvements that the masses have enjoyed because of the advent of digital there really hasn't been a major steps in the quality of reproduction in many years.
Someone wants to claim they are an expert in two channel, stereo, audio? Fine I say they are a bore and I'd like to add that their track record over the last 40 years just goes to prove it.
I quess there's nothing like demanding respect for beating the same old dead horse.
And maybe I'm just technical enough to be clueless but the thought of using multi-channel audio, feedback and equalization to map one listening environment into another excites me to no end. Stereo should have went the route of the typewriter many years ago. But I've said this before and I'll say it again - why would engineers and scientists make the effort to more accurately reproduce sounds/music when those who would fund it are so easily satisfied simply spending more money next time on their next 2 channel audio equipment upgrade.
At one time I would have naturally assumed the next round of technical advancements would be driven by those of us involved in perfectionist audio. Now though I know I've been wrong. The next round of technical advancements in audio reproduction is going to be driven by other markets. Maybe gaming or video - most audio perfectionists seem willing to settle for conspicuous consumption under the quise of cutting edge technology even though most teenagers are capable of seeing it as old, boring and insultingly expensive.
Give me rhythm or give me death!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Not quite - Don T 17:11:55 05/23/06 (13)
- Fresh spin. - soulfood 19:58:57 05/23/06 (12)
- Re: Fresh spin. - Don T 21:34:40 05/23/06 (11)
- Re: Fresh spin. - soulfood 09:09:54 05/24/06 (10)
- That's not what I said. - Don T 20:04:52 05/24/06 (9)
- In retrospect, I shouldn't have expected you to man up to it. - soulfood 08:04:38 05/25/06 (8)
- Seems to me that Don_T is saying something reasonable - real_jj 08:51:15 05/25/06 (7)
- Stereo is here to stay! - soulfood 11:40:44 05/25/06 (6)
- You did read the discussion that's now on the second page, didn't you? - real_jj 12:47:26 05/25/06 (5)
- Can't say for sure. Did I inadvertently challenge your credentials? (nt) - soulfood 13:39:24 05/25/06 (4)
- I guess you don't want to talk about real audio issues... - real_jj 15:35:21 05/25/06 (3)
- The presumption being, you embody "real audio issues". - soulfood 17:18:53 05/25/06 (2)
- No, it was to point out that you were willfully preventing audio discussions.... - real_jj 19:17:37 05/25/06 (1)
- You're reaffirming my previous post. (nt) - soulfood 19:47:56 05/25/06 (0)