Topic - More on Class D amps - Dan Banquer 16:52:00 04/10/06 (26)

• JAES Article - real_jj 16:26:30 04/13/06 (3)
• Re: JAES Article - Dan Banquer 17:28:13 04/13/06 (2)
• Re: JAES Article - real_jj 14:03:31 04/18/06 (1)
• Thanks JJ - Dan Banquer 16:07:19 04/18/06 (0)
• Re: More on Class D amps - Todd Krieger 20:56:12 04/12/06 (6)
• Do you, now? - real_jj 16:27:38 04/13/06 (2)
• Re: Do you, now? - Todd Krieger 19:37:20 04/13/06 (1)
• Re: Do you, now? - real_jj 20:49:23 04/13/06 (0)
• Re: More on Class D amps - Tom Dawson 06:56:00 04/13/06 (0)
• I respectfully disagree - Bersani 23:40:44 04/12/06 (1)
• Re: I respectfully disagree - theaudiohobby 05:02:20 04/13/06 (0)
• Hmmmm. 4V p-p switching artifacts @ 100khz through my speaker cables. - Tom Dawson 09:28:46 04/12/06 (9)
• You actually measured it? (nt) - cheap-Jack 10:41:53 04/12/06 (8)
• Naw. But I trust that Dan Banquer's measurement of it was done correctly nt - Tom Dawson 10:52:43 04/12/06 (7)
• RFI is always a PITA for class Ds. - cheap-Jack 11:23:33 04/12/06 (6)
• Re: RFI is always a PITA for class Ds. - Todd Krieger 21:42:58 04/12/06 (0)
• This might answer your question - Dan Banquer 16:46:02 04/12/06 (4)
• From consumer's view point, no! - cheap-Jack 14:10:36 04/13/06 (3)
• My apologies for clouding the issue with facts. - Dan Banquer 15:57:57 04/13/06 (2)
• Don't worry. - cheap-Jack 18:34:05 04/13/06 (1)
• how about looking down the page to where you 'oopsed' talking about conduction, eh? - real_jj 12:43:32 04/25/06 (0)
• “Out of band rejection and noise reduction go hand in hand.” - Al Sekela 11:39:47 04/11/06 (0)
• Re: More on Class D amps - rick_m 11:01:20 04/11/06 (0)
• Do you know how your findings might differ from the manufacture's? (nt) - soulfood 19:59:37 04/10/06 (2)
• I'll let you ask that question to the manufacturers your are referencing. nt - Dan Banquer 03:12:46 04/11/06 (1)
• I was referring to panasonic. Prudent advice though, thanks. (nt) - soulfood 04:55:04 04/11/06 (0)