In Reply to: I can assure you that Clark was deeply involved in remote-sensing optics, where he learned... posted by clarkjohnsen on February 5, 2006 at 12:05:52:
> The "scientific method" as generally practiced in audio by wanna-be PhDs is junk.Can we generalise that to:
the "scientific method" as generally practiced in audio is junk?
which would be a clear statement of your position and avoid any question of your being a phony (or a physicist).
The wanna-be PhDs bit makes it a bit vague since it would exclude those with PhDs and those who are quite content and have no wish to study for a PhD. Apart from those studying for a PhD exactly who would it include? See the problem.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I can assure you that Clark was deeply involved in remote-sensing optics, where he learned... - andy19191 12:30:52 02/05/06 (5)
- The phrase "wanna-be PhDs" refers to all those who high-handedly preach a received wisdom... - clarkjohnsen 09:56:51 02/06/06 (4)
- No PhD in audio? - Silver Eared John 23:51:26 02/13/06 (0)
- Re: The phrase "wanna-be PhDs" refers to all those who high-handedly preach a received wisdom... - andy19191 11:31:56 02/06/06 (2)
- Yes. And, a "wanna-be PhD." is not a degree candidate. Geez Luiz. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:44:52 02/07/06 (1)
- Re: Yes. And, a "wanna-be PhD." is not a degree candidate. Geez Luiz. nt - andy19191 13:43:19 02/07/06 (0)