In Reply to: Re: Please, a question for RBP posted by Fear3000 on April 23, 2001 at 22:28:00:
Why, hello there Felix! Fancy running into you again. The Pro Asylum sure is a neat place to hang out, don't you think?Rather non-sequitor, you state:
>> Bill's history leaves quite a few unanswered questions driven by totally conflicting histories written by himself. <<
What is your definition of "totally conflicting"? Your use of the phrase seems to be based on more speculation than anything. For example, Bill originally stated "BTW...I actually co designed many phono cartridges with Ortofon in the late 70's..." which prompts your inquiry:
>> Given Bill's age, he was in his teens at the time. <<
What was Bill's age at the time, pray tell? A couple years makes a lot of difference at that time in one's life. Is it "totally conflicting" to be both young and co-designing phono cartridges?
>> You see, gain vs voltage is a logarithmic function, and Bill not knowing that fact, given his claims of being a cartridge designer and his claims of postgraduate accreditation in Acoustics, leaves a valid question hanging in the wind. <<
What are you talking about? A couple of message titles in a deleted thread on a message board containing something about a mathematical log function definitely leaves a question hanging in some sort of wind, but it's hard to see what's so "totally conflicting" here.
>> Before you continue aligning yourself with other victims of botched lobotomies <<
Tsk, tsk, Felix. Either you're being metaphorical or you don't understand what effects lobotomies have. If you're being metaphorical, you must be trying to insult Bill. What a surprise. Fear3000 *never* tries to insult people, right?
>> you may want to think about defending an individual who's been seemingly doing his best to deceive the group.
http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/reviewers/billroberts.htm
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/pro/messages/548.html <<
Deception involves truth, i.e. objective reality, out of congruence with a person's statements or actions. What do you *know* about Bill that doesn't match up with his statements? Until you can back up your accusations with hard fact, you are doing nothing more than speculating and nitpicking.
Just out of curiosity, what happened to your indignant queries about "What albums have you mastered, Bill?" Bill wrote to this kindred spirit of yours named "Buster":
>> my involvement with Artist, projects, project numbers, or any work in which I associate myself with a contract or client is the sole property of the Record company, client, and private indiviguals involved.
I am in no liberty to discuss these projects and I hope in the future questions of this nature should be avoided. <<
Is Felix satisfied by this explanation?
Best Wishes,
Andrew
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Please, a question for RBP - AndrewH 05:46:19 04/24/01 (0)