In Reply to: I've found it! Something w/ ASIO that sounds better than Foobar2000 posted by bullethead on April 8, 2007 at 08:49:36:
Yes, sometimes XMPlay+Asio sybjectively sounds better than foobar2000+ASIO (but not on all music material)I've tested XMPlay+ASIO-32-bit and foobar2000+ASIO-32-bit on M-AUDIO REVO 5.1 on mp3 tracks.
Some live acoustic music tracks (Craig Chaquico, Acoustic Alchemy, Chris Spheeris) espesially guitar strings sounds more raw-nylon-like on XMPlay, more pleasure for some ears.
With modern synthetic, industrial-Metal music - foobar2000 sounds clear-er with more detailed pleasure-sounded synthetic noises, layed in composition by sound engeneers.
The difference is by mp3-decoders (BASS in XMPlay and mpg123 in foobar2000) mpg123 is recommended for LAME, has extremily good (digital) precicion quality and supported by Hydrogen-Audio community.
I don't now anything about objective testing of BASS mp3 decoder.
Difference on lossless formats - is only placebo.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I've found it! Something w/ ASIO that sounds better than Foobar2000 - PaVliQ 12:16:02 05/01/07 (0)