In Reply to: Completely unfounded and unproven IMHO posted by Scrith on August 22, 2006 at 13:39:39:
As we all know, DACs are sensitive to even small fluctuations in power supply, EMI etc.And as we know, logic transitions may create small power supply ripples or generate EMI.
Therefore it is theoretically possible that loading and unloading DLLs, or even the sequence in which DLLs are invoked, may have a possible impact on the sound. It is also possible that having too many loaded DLLs and not enough memory may cause additional paging activity which may affect the playback.
However, it is certainly a stretch to suggest that actively manipulating the status of DLLs in memory will make a big difference in the sound quality. At least any more than the zillions of other types of memory activity or logic transitions occuring in a computer.
Then again, Microsoft Windows is a highly complex and non orthogonal operating system - who knows maybe there is more here than it seems.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Not completely unfounded and unproven, but certainly misrepresented - Christine Tham 21:45:04 08/22/06 (24)
- True - Scrith 23:08:50 08/22/06 (1)
- I *was* being a bit of a devil's advocate ... - Christine Tham 01:39:34 08/23/06 (0)
- WinXP has in excess of 50 million lines of code - danny kaey 22:16:28 08/22/06 (21)
- Re: WinXP has in excess of 50 million lines of code - fmak 03:51:11 08/24/06 (20)
- Re: WinXP has in excess of 50 million lines of code - KeithC 08:32:24 08/24/06 (19)
- Re: WinXP has in excess of 50 million lines of code - fmak 12:28:47 08/24/06 (18)
- Re: WinXP has in excess of 50 million lines of code - KeithC 15:34:51 08/24/06 (17)
- it does have )50 million lines of code - danny kaey 15:41:39 08/24/06 (16)
- Re: it does have )50 million lines of code - KeithC 15:57:53 08/24/06 (15)
- no matter how you slice and dice, Windows is bloated beyond belief - danny kaey 16:02:58 08/24/06 (14)
- Re: no matter how you slice and dice, Windows is bloated beyond belief - KeithC 16:22:35 08/24/06 (13)
- I agree, but there's no point continuing the conversation ... - Christine Tham 17:08:35 08/24/06 (12)
- Re: I agree, but there's no point continuing the conversation ... - KeithC 18:05:41 08/24/06 (11)
- Yeah, isn't it amazing - Christine Tham 19:06:05 08/24/06 (10)
- I never understood why MS didn't go the route of an emulator ala Rosetta - danny kaey 19:26:42 08/24/06 (9)
- Re: I never understood why MS didn't go the route of an emulator ala Rosetta - Christine Tham 19:58:21 08/24/06 (8)
- f00ls!!! - danny kaey 20:22:32 08/24/06 (7)
- Re: f00ls!!! - KeithC 00:04:54 08/25/06 (6)
- Re: f00ls!!! - fmak 00:19:31 08/25/06 (5)
- Re: f00ls!!! - KeithC 05:06:09 08/25/06 (0)
- Sheesh! Only 30 years??? What a young pup! - Christine Tham 01:47:12 08/25/06 (3)
- Re: Sheesh! Only 30 years??? What a young pup! - fmak 10:50:44 08/25/06 (0)
- Re: Sheesh! Only 30 years??? What a young pup! - Mercman 10:18:09 08/25/06 (0)
- Re: Sheesh! Only 30 years??? What a young pup! - KeithC 03:47:10 08/25/06 (0)