In Reply to: Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. posted by Lew on June 29, 2005 at 07:05:15:
You are basically correct about the Joule OTL's topology. The details in the exceution of the design are of course a more complex and what makes the Joule amps what they are. Having had a tutorial by Jud Barber on the design of his amps, while not rocket science, I certainly understand that he preferes to keep certain implimentation/excecution details of his OTLs to himself.
Happy Listening,
Rich Brkich
Retailer & Audio Asylum Industry Liaison
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Rich Brkich 12:30:16 06/29/05 (6)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Lew 12:35:22 06/29/05 (5)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Rich Brkich 08:16:44 06/30/05 (4)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Lew 10:27:19 06/30/05 (3)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Rich Brkich 12:41:11 06/30/05 (2)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Lew 10:17:43 07/01/05 (1)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Rich Brkich 14:03:16 07/01/05 (0)