In Reply to: Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. posted by Tom Dawson on June 28, 2005 at 12:36:42:
There you go. I guess we will have to imagine your circuit. I certainly did not mean to imply that there are no viable alternatives to the Futterman and circlotron. Do you plan to market amplifiers using your novel topology?While we are at it, can anyone exposit on the Joule and Graaf circuit topologies? I really know very little about either of those two. I have been guessing that Joule uses a mu-follower to drive a circlotron, but it's just a guess.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Lew 07:05:15 06/29/05 (8)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Rich Brkich 12:30:16 06/29/05 (6)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Lew 12:35:22 06/29/05 (5)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Rich Brkich 08:16:44 06/30/05 (4)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Lew 10:27:19 06/30/05 (3)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Rich Brkich 12:41:11 06/30/05 (2)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Lew 10:17:43 07/01/05 (1)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Rich Brkich 14:03:16 07/01/05 (0)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Tom Dawson 08:19:38 06/29/05 (0)