In Reply to: RE: is it ok to examine some BLH horn by converting to FLH? posted by Paul Eizik on July 17, 2007 at 09:20:01:
hey Paul - here's a real BLH built by "awhite" over at the fullrange forum using Fostex 225K. IIRC throat area is around 8 sq.in.I asked the builder to put a sealed chamber over the front - he took a graph and I mucked with it a bit adding his plans to show the horn's folds
here's what he came up with FOR RESPONSE
some BLH-horn-designers insist upon smooth curved surfaces while others might take an approach ~like Olson's 1937 patent.
questions - whats important in making good and good sounding BLH? how far up must the rear wave show "gain" and how does baffle-step and what can be expected of the rear wave's contribution and summation(s)
in real world horns?imo that graph is cool - seems like method I suggested would pretty well separate the rear-wave performance and beamwidth with a few traces - whadya think?
Freddy
Edits: 07/17/07
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: is it ok to examine some BLH horn by converting to FLH? - freddyi 11:27:49 07/17/07 (5)
- RE: is it ok to examine some BLH horn by converting to FLH? - Paul Eizik 19:34:58 07/17/07 (4)
- RE: is it ok to examine some BLH horn by converting to FLH? - freddyi 07:59:52 07/18/07 (3)
- RE: is it ok to examine some BLH horn by converting to FLH? - Paul Eizik 09:25:09 07/18/07 (2)
- RE: is it ok to examine some BLH horn by converting to FLH? - freddyi 09:58:52 07/18/07 (1)
- RE: is it ok to examine some BLH horn by converting to FLH? - Paul Eizik 19:45:39 07/18/07 (0)