In Reply to: is it ok to examine some BLH horn by converting to FLH? posted by freddyi on July 15, 2007 at 09:06:27:
Hi Fred
I dunno if it answers the question or not, but it's an interesting comparison. The BLH is very rough and peaky above 200 Hz, but most of this would be rolled off by the muffler effect of the labarynth in most typical designs. While the FLH goes lower, the BLH has a nice flat plateau from just over 50 Hz to over 80 Hz, which gives some justification to using this design over a FLH where use of a reactance anulling box is possible. Contra to this is the predicted 140 Ohm peak for the BLH at just under 20 Hz (yikes!) where the FLH is nice and flat. So it looks like there's both some good news and some bad news for BLH's and us double loaders too.
Thanks Freddyi Labs!
Paul
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: is it ok to examine some BLH horn by converting to FLH? - Paul Eizik 09:20:01 07/17/07 (6)
- RE: is it ok to examine some BLH horn by converting to FLH? - freddyi 11:27:49 07/17/07 (5)
- RE: is it ok to examine some BLH horn by converting to FLH? - Paul Eizik 19:34:58 07/17/07 (4)
- RE: is it ok to examine some BLH horn by converting to FLH? - freddyi 07:59:52 07/18/07 (3)
- RE: is it ok to examine some BLH horn by converting to FLH? - Paul Eizik 09:25:09 07/18/07 (2)
- RE: is it ok to examine some BLH horn by converting to FLH? - freddyi 09:58:52 07/18/07 (1)
- RE: is it ok to examine some BLH horn by converting to FLH? - Paul Eizik 19:45:39 07/18/07 (0)