In Reply to: Re: 90% (Not even close) posted by Paul Eizik on April 12, 2007 at 11:10:30:
You said, "Someone needs to correlate all this with the price of plywood. I'm betting on a bull plywood market, so build your horns now guys!. Anyone wanna take bear?"Actually I posted after you tossed out a post with some political comments mixed in. I figured this is simply giving the other side a voice. In this case it is the real verifiable Science itself that has proven the Global Warming Alarmists are all full of hot air only.
Actually the 100 plus missing suitcase nukes only weigh around 100 pounds each. That is easily portable. They were basically designed for small two man teams to deliver. The Russians made these to level the field when America designed the first man portable tactical nukes around 1965. I have to wonder how Russia "lost" something like 110 of these things? You lose car keys, or your wallet. Not 100 portable nukes.. That is far more dangerous to me than the false global warming fairy tales.
You said, "Now for the U.N. trying to gain control of the internet to redistribute the wealth. You'll have to elaborate on this, the current U.N. is about as effective as a fart in a windstorm. You must mean some potential super U.N. of the future, like the Empire in Star Wars?"
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8CUKA481&show_article=1
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0916/p08s02-comv.html
http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2005/10/17/dont_give_un_control_over_internet/
Snip; (whole articles below in links) "It claimed to be the opinion of 2,500 leading scientists, but Prof Reiter said it included names of scientists who disagreed with the findings and resigned from the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and said the report was finalised by Government appointees.
The CO2 theory is further undermined by claims that billions of pounds is being provided by governments to fund greenhouse effect research, so thousands of scientists know their job depends on the theory continuing to be seen as fact."
http://www.lse.co.uk/ShowStory.asp?story=CZ434669U&news_headline=global_warming_is_lies_claims_documentary
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html
http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p357.htm
The last link above is the website with 17,000 plus scientists with over 2/3 of them having earned advanced degrees in the field of Science. They have all signed the petition about the global warming lies. I have a lowly Bachelor of Science degree myself. For the Global Warming fanatics to cry the sky is falling is nuts. To get their papers into any accredited peer review science journal their experiments must be repeatable in real world testing experiments in order to validate their claims. Even the just released UN report warns their yet to be released upcoming study has failed to meet this criteria. For me whenever I read a story like "The Sun is Dimming or a Global Warming" story run in a UK newspaper I just have to roll my eyes. These types of stories always seem to originate in the UK and/or Scotland sadly.
As for my favorite flavor of wood lets make it the good stuff please. Nothing but the rarest old growth will due for me for my first generation of 16 ohm Altec Duplex speakers. John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: 90% (Not even close) - John Chleapas 23:26:06 04/13/07 (1)
- Re: 90% (Not even close) - Paul Eizik 21:37:08 04/14/07 (0)