In Reply to: Re: Yes, he is. posted by patrickU on April 18, 2007 at 04:20:12:
In my response, I was angry at myself for making two silly mistakes - mistakes that I knew were mistakes the minute you said something. I'm not at all upset at you for pointing them out! I can see how it came off that way, though. Sorry!I forgot that self-deprication and sarcasm don't always come through when typing.
Seriously, thanks, though!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Yes, he is. - lazarus28 12:00:27 04/18/07 (1)
- Re: Yes, he is. - patrickU 12:28:39 04/18/07 (0)