In Reply to: he is? posted by lazarus28 on April 18, 2007 at 04:09:05:
Can not put your reaction in any category.
Why angry?
I meant you spoke of fact, and I told you it was not exact.
So what is your problem with it?
Me?
But not because I know better, I mean the kind of guy who ALWAYS knows better.
Not that kind.
We are not here to ignore but to communicate.
All right?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Yes, he is. - patrickU 04:20:12 04/18/07 (2)
- Re: Yes, he is. - lazarus28 12:00:27 04/18/07 (1)
- Re: Yes, he is. - patrickU 12:28:39 04/18/07 (0)