Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Moody Blues -- Lost Chord 5.1 read problem - zomax 17:03:30 04/06/06 (81)

• Re: Moody Blues -- Lost Chord 5.1 read problem - Garnot 13:09:50 04/07/06 (3)
• Re: Moody Blues -- Lost Chord 5.1 read problem - zomax 15:42:16 04/07/06 (2)
• If The Description Of The Disc Is Inaccurate - Robertc88 04:39:10 04/08/06 (1)
• Got it from CD-WOW, along with Depeche Mode's Violator - zomax 08:20:27 04/08/06 (0)
• It Is Stereo Only - Robertc88 03:42:28 04/07/06 (3)
• Re: It Is Stereo Only - zomax 04:14:41 04/07/06 (2)
• Is "SACD" On The Packaging For Lost Chord? - Robertc88 06:02:23 04/07/06 (1)
• There is absolutely no mention of "SACD" On The Packaging For Lost Chord? - zomax 15:35:03 04/07/06 (0)
• Re: Moody Blues -- Lost Chord 5.1 read problem - flyingdutchman 21:13:16 04/06/06 (2)
• No 5.1 Layer - Tommart 13:52:31 04/08/06 (1)
• "Lost Chord" was never remixed for Quad (nt) - racerguy 14:39:40 04/08/06 (0)
• How's the 2ch layer sound quality? nt - OvenBun 17:33:25 04/06/06 (69)
• Some reports are not encouraging - Metralla 08:30:10 04/07/06 (68)
• It's no wonder that record companies hesitate to release geezer rock - racerguy 16:49:13 04/07/06 (8)
• Geezer Rock Great Sound ALERT!!! - sgb 16:52:44 04/08/06 (0)
• here's a geezer rock album that does sound hi rez - The Who: Tommy - Teresa 22:03:33 04/07/06 (3)
• Teresa, I'm not saying there aren't good-sounding rock releases on SACD - racerguy 07:03:40 04/08/06 (2)
• speed demon, I am one such detractor. - Ozzie 10:41:26 04/08/06 (1)
• Re: speed demon, I am one such detractor. - racerguy 19:59:24 04/09/06 (0)
• The problem is.... - Pacman 21:29:00 04/07/06 (2)
• Hey pal, - Ozzie 11:21:47 04/08/06 (1)
• LOL; nt - Pacman 10:22:12 04/09/06 (0)
• Re: Some reports are not encouraging - flyingdutchman 09:22:38 04/07/06 (58)
• OK, let's see what multi-channel listeners report - Metralla 13:28:42 04/07/06 (57)
• I no care about the surreound mix as well. - Ozzie 11:27:05 04/08/06 (4)
• Re: I no care about the surreound mix as well. - flyingdutchman 12:47:37 04/08/06 (3)
• Not correct - racerguy 14:32:55 04/08/06 (2)
• Re: Not correct--not correct - flyingdutchman 15:25:38 04/08/06 (1)
• Still wrong - racerguy 16:14:08 04/08/06 (0)
• How are Redbook layer sonics? nt - Jim Ricketts 16:41:29 04/07/06 (0)
• I second that emotion! - Teresa 16:41:28 04/07/06 (50)
• Re: I second that emotion! - flyingdutchman 20:18:20 04/07/06 (20)
• Correction: I was alive then and collecting music and it was released in 2 Channel STEREO and 4 channel QUAD! - Teresa 21:10:59 04/07/06 (19)
• Re: Correction: I was alive then and collecting music and it was released in 2 Channel STEREO and 4 channel QUAD! - flyingdutchman 21:32:23 04/07/06 (18)
• Were you I alive then? Millions care about 2 channel STEREO, that's who! Quad died you know! (nt) - Teresa 22:06:01 04/07/06 (17)
• Re: Were you I alive then? Millions care about 2 channel STEREO, that's who! Quad died you know! (nt) - flyingdutchman 22:08:24 04/07/06 (16)
• Home Theater can also be 2 channel STEREO, as I am sure most are. - Teresa 22:16:54 04/07/06 (15)
• Re: Home Theater can also be 2 channel STEREO, as I am sure most are. - claypool 23:56:36 04/08/06 (1)
• I agree there is enough room on SACDs for both 2 channel Stereo and multi-channel and they should both be done correctly - Teresa 01:07:37 04/09/06 (0)
• What about your 2-channel snobbery!!! - MT 08:27:21 04/08/06 (12)
• I am open minded! There is enough room on an SACD for both. Why are you cheering a multi-channel bigot? - Teresa 01:18:37 04/09/06 (10)
• Re: I am open minded! There is enough room on an SACD for both. Why are you cheering a multi-channel bigot? - flyingdutchman 12:23:59 04/09/06 (9)
• You are talking about something you know absolutely nothing about. Yes I did switch from multi-channel to 2 channel! - Teresa 18:06:40 04/09/06 (8)
• With all due respect, Teresa.... - Pacman 19:25:55 04/09/06 (2)
• Funny the 2 channel Stereo in a high end store sounds great. Plus - Teresa 08:14:50 04/10/06 (0)
• Re: With all due respect, Teresa.... - flyingdutchman 19:29:08 04/09/06 (0)
• Re: You are talking about something you know absolutely nothing about. Yes I did switch from multi-channel to 2 channel - flyingdutchman 18:37:20 04/09/06 (4)
• You are wrong once again. - Teresa 19:00:29 04/09/06 (3)
• Re: You are wrong once again. - flyingdutchman 19:10:30 04/09/06 (2)
• A lot of listening, he was one of my best friends. Also other experiences include: - Teresa 08:20:34 04/10/06 (1)
• You freak me out Teresa (nt) - paulcordingley 20:33:18 04/10/06 (0)
• Well said!!! (nt) - Garnot 08:34:56 04/08/06 (1)
• I don't understand - ted_b 18:49:08 04/07/06 (28)
• It they screwed up I will sell it of course. The reason to by the 2 channel STEREO is for the greatly increased fidelity - Teresa 21:19:58 04/07/06 (27)
• Re: It they screwed up I will sell it of course. The reason to by the 2 channel STEREO is for the greatly increased fide - ted_b 21:46:29 04/07/06 (0)
• Re: It they screwed up I will sell it of course. The reason to by the 2 channel STEREO is for the greatly increased fide - flyingdutchman 21:33:41 04/07/06 (25)
• Re: Most people - claypool 23:41:39 04/08/06 (15)
• Re: Most people - flyingdutchman 17:13:09 04/09/06 (12)
• So, you are saying... - racerguy 17:20:51 04/09/06 (11)
• Re: So, you are saying... - flyingdutchman 18:14:18 04/09/06 (10)
• I understand your point, however... - racerguy 18:42:38 04/09/06 (9)
• Re: I understand your point, however... - flyingdutchman 19:19:27 04/09/06 (1)
• More than one - racerguy 19:51:17 04/09/06 (0)
• Re: I understand your point, however... - flyingdutchman 19:15:44 04/09/06 (6)
• backpedaling - racerguy 19:44:22 04/09/06 (5)
• Re: backpedaling - flyingdutchman 19:52:24 04/09/06 (4)
• Re: backpedaling - racerguy 20:01:11 04/09/06 (3)
• Re: backpedaling - flyingdutchman 20:07:18 04/09/06 (2)
• OK, sport, whatever you say (nt) - racerguy 20:15:04 04/09/06 (1)
• Oh, thank you--you're so kind and gracious (nt) - flyingdutchman 20:43:21 04/09/06 (0)
• Yep - racerguy 06:33:27 04/09/06 (1)
• You nailed it that is most people (nt) - Teresa 18:09:33 04/09/06 (0)
• Re: It they screwed up I will sell it of course. The reason to by the 2 channel STEREO is for the greatly increased fide - Ozzie 12:34:48 04/08/06 (3)
• Re: It they screwed up I will sell it of course. The reason to by the 2 channel STEREO is for the greatly increased fide - flyingdutchman 12:46:44 04/08/06 (2)
• Take a long drag and another sip of coffee. - Ozzie 07:05:48 04/11/06 (0)
• Take a long drag and another sip of coffee. - Ozzie 16:15:23 04/10/06 (0)
• Prove it! I have only been to one home that had multi-channel the rear speakers were setting on top the front speakers. - Teresa 22:10:27 04/07/06 (4)
• Re: Prove it! I have only been to one home that had multi-channel the rear speakers were setting on top the front speak - flyingdutchman 22:15:34 04/07/06 (3)
• Duh, who do you expect in a multi-channel forum except multi-channel users - Teresa 22:23:14 04/07/06 (2)
• Re: Duh, who do you expect in a multi-channel forum except multi-channel users - flyingdutchman 22:40:32 04/07/06 (1)
• but most people don't even use a Stereo or multi-channel system with their TV or HDTV they use the built in speakers - Teresa 04:04:47 04/08/06 (0)

Follow Ups

• Oh, thank you--you're so kind and gracious (nt) - flyingdutchman 20:43:21 04/09/06 (0)