I no care about the surreound mix as well. - Ozzie

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Moody Blues -- Lost Chord 5.1 read problem - zomax 17:03:30 04/06/06 (81)

Re: Moody Blues -- Lost Chord 5.1 read problem - Garnot 13:09:50 04/07/06 (3)

Re: Moody Blues -- Lost Chord 5.1 read problem - zomax 15:42:16 04/07/06 (2)

If The Description Of The Disc Is Inaccurate - Robertc88 04:39:10 04/08/06 (1)

Got it from CD-WOW, along with Depeche Mode's Violator - zomax 08:20:27 04/08/06 (0)

It Is Stereo Only - Robertc88 03:42:28 04/07/06 (3)

Re: It Is Stereo Only - zomax 04:14:41 04/07/06 (2)

Is "SACD" On The Packaging For Lost Chord? - Robertc88 06:02:23 04/07/06 (1)

There is absolutely no mention of "SACD" On The Packaging For Lost Chord? - zomax 15:35:03 04/07/06 (0)

Re: Moody Blues -- Lost Chord 5.1 read problem - flyingdutchman 21:13:16 04/06/06 (2)

No 5.1 Layer - Tommart 13:52:31 04/08/06 (1)

"Lost Chord" was never remixed for Quad (nt) - racerguy 14:39:40 04/08/06 (0)

How's the 2ch layer sound quality? nt - OvenBun 17:33:25 04/06/06 (69)

Some reports are not encouraging - Metralla 08:30:10 04/07/06 (68)

It's no wonder that record companies hesitate to release geezer rock - racerguy 16:49:13 04/07/06 (8)

Geezer Rock Great Sound ALERT!!! - sgb 16:52:44 04/08/06 (0)

here's a geezer rock album that does sound hi rez - The Who: Tommy - Teresa 22:03:33 04/07/06 (3)

Teresa, I'm not saying there aren't good-sounding rock releases on SACD - racerguy 07:03:40 04/08/06 (2)

speed demon, I am one such detractor. - Ozzie 10:41:26 04/08/06 (1)

Re: speed demon, I am one such detractor. - racerguy 19:59:24 04/09/06 (0)

The problem is.... - Pacman 21:29:00 04/07/06 (2)

Hey pal, - Ozzie 11:21:47 04/08/06 (1)

LOL; nt - Pacman 10:22:12 04/09/06 (0)

Re: Some reports are not encouraging - flyingdutchman 09:22:38 04/07/06 (58)

OK, let's see what multi-channel listeners report - Metralla 13:28:42 04/07/06 (57)

I no care about the surreound mix as well. - Ozzie 11:27:05 04/08/06 (4)

Re: I no care about the surreound mix as well. - flyingdutchman 12:47:37 04/08/06 (3)

Not correct - racerguy 14:32:55 04/08/06 (2)

Re: Not correct--not correct - flyingdutchman 15:25:38 04/08/06 (1)

Still wrong - racerguy 16:14:08 04/08/06 (0)

How are Redbook layer sonics? nt - Jim Ricketts 16:41:29 04/07/06 (0)

I second that emotion! - Teresa 16:41:28 04/07/06 (50)

Re: I second that emotion! - flyingdutchman 20:18:20 04/07/06 (20)

Correction: I was alive then and collecting music and it was released in 2 Channel STEREO and 4 channel QUAD! - Teresa 21:10:59 04/07/06 (19)

Re: Correction: I was alive then and collecting music and it was released in 2 Channel STEREO and 4 channel QUAD! - flyingdutchman 21:32:23 04/07/06 (18)

Were you I alive then? Millions care about 2 channel STEREO, that's who! Quad died you know! (nt) - Teresa 22:06:01 04/07/06 (17)

Re: Were you I alive then? Millions care about 2 channel STEREO, that's who! Quad died you know! (nt) - flyingdutchman 22:08:24 04/07/06 (16)

Home Theater can also be 2 channel STEREO, as I am sure most are. - Teresa 22:16:54 04/07/06 (15)

Re: Home Theater can also be 2 channel STEREO, as I am sure most are. - claypool 23:56:36 04/08/06 (1)

I agree there is enough room on SACDs for both 2 channel Stereo and multi-channel and they should both be done correctly - Teresa 01:07:37 04/09/06 (0)

What about your 2-channel snobbery!!! - MT 08:27:21 04/08/06 (12)

I am open minded! There is enough room on an SACD for both. Why are you cheering a multi-channel bigot? - Teresa 01:18:37 04/09/06 (10)

Re: I am open minded! There is enough room on an SACD for both. Why are you cheering a multi-channel bigot? - flyingdutchman 12:23:59 04/09/06 (9)

You are talking about something you know absolutely nothing about. Yes I did switch from multi-channel to 2 channel! - Teresa 18:06:40 04/09/06 (8)

With all due respect, Teresa.... - Pacman 19:25:55 04/09/06 (2)

Funny the 2 channel Stereo in a high end store sounds great. Plus - Teresa 08:14:50 04/10/06 (0)

Re: With all due respect, Teresa.... - flyingdutchman 19:29:08 04/09/06 (0)

Re: You are talking about something you know absolutely nothing about. Yes I did switch from multi-channel to 2 channel - flyingdutchman 18:37:20 04/09/06 (4)

You are wrong once again. - Teresa 19:00:29 04/09/06 (3)

Re: You are wrong once again. - flyingdutchman 19:10:30 04/09/06 (2)

A lot of listening, he was one of my best friends. Also other experiences include: - Teresa 08:20:34 04/10/06 (1)

You freak me out Teresa (nt) - paulcordingley 20:33:18 04/10/06 (0)

Well said!!! (nt) - Garnot 08:34:56 04/08/06 (1)

I don't understand - ted_b 18:49:08 04/07/06 (28)

It they screwed up I will sell it of course. The reason to by the 2 channel STEREO is for the greatly increased fidelity - Teresa 21:19:58 04/07/06 (27)

Re: It they screwed up I will sell it of course. The reason to by the 2 channel STEREO is for the greatly increased fide - ted_b 21:46:29 04/07/06 (0)

Re: It they screwed up I will sell it of course. The reason to by the 2 channel STEREO is for the greatly increased fide - flyingdutchman 21:33:41 04/07/06 (25)

Re: Most people - claypool 23:41:39 04/08/06 (15)

Re: Most people - flyingdutchman 17:13:09 04/09/06 (12)

So, you are saying... - racerguy 17:20:51 04/09/06 (11)

Re: So, you are saying... - flyingdutchman 18:14:18 04/09/06 (10)

I understand your point, however... - racerguy 18:42:38 04/09/06 (9)

Re: I understand your point, however... - flyingdutchman 19:19:27 04/09/06 (1)

More than one - racerguy 19:51:17 04/09/06 (0)

Re: I understand your point, however... - flyingdutchman 19:15:44 04/09/06 (6)

backpedaling - racerguy 19:44:22 04/09/06 (5)

Re: backpedaling - flyingdutchman 19:52:24 04/09/06 (4)

Re: backpedaling - racerguy 20:01:11 04/09/06 (3)

Re: backpedaling - flyingdutchman 20:07:18 04/09/06 (2)

OK, sport, whatever you say (nt) - racerguy 20:15:04 04/09/06 (1)

Oh, thank you--you're so kind and gracious (nt) - flyingdutchman 20:43:21 04/09/06 (0)

Yep - racerguy 06:33:27 04/09/06 (1)

You nailed it that is most people (nt) - Teresa 18:09:33 04/09/06 (0)

Re: It they screwed up I will sell it of course. The reason to by the 2 channel STEREO is for the greatly increased fide - Ozzie 12:34:48 04/08/06 (3)

Re: It they screwed up I will sell it of course. The reason to by the 2 channel STEREO is for the greatly increased fide - flyingdutchman 12:46:44 04/08/06 (2)

Take a long drag and another sip of coffee. - Ozzie 07:05:48 04/11/06 (0)

Take a long drag and another sip of coffee. - Ozzie 16:15:23 04/10/06 (0)

Prove it! I have only been to one home that had multi-channel the rear speakers were setting on top the front speakers. - Teresa 22:10:27 04/07/06 (4)

Re: Prove it! I have only been to one home that had multi-channel the rear speakers were setting on top the front speak - flyingdutchman 22:15:34 04/07/06 (3)

Duh, who do you expect in a multi-channel forum except multi-channel users - Teresa 22:23:14 04/07/06 (2)

Re: Duh, who do you expect in a multi-channel forum except multi-channel users - flyingdutchman 22:40:32 04/07/06 (1)

but most people don't even use a Stereo or multi-channel system with their TV or HDTV they use the built in speakers - Teresa 04:04:47 04/08/06 (0)

Follow Ups

I no care about the surreound mix as well. - Ozzie 11:27:05 04/08/06 (4)

Re: I no care about the surreound mix as well. - flyingdutchman 12:47:37 04/08/06 (3)

Not correct - racerguy 14:32:55 04/08/06 (2)

Re: Not correct--not correct - flyingdutchman 15:25:38 04/08/06 (1)

Still wrong - racerguy 16:14:08 04/08/06 (0)