In Reply to: Sorry Martin you are still defending a DEFECTIVE FORMAT posted by Teresa on December 22, 2005 at 18:51:36:
nt
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- No, I merely quoted directly from the actual CD spec figures . . . - Martin419 03:08:26 12/23/05 (8)
- What you quoted was incorrect as I have proven. These are not the specs for any Disc format. - Teresa 06:49:36 12/23/05 (7)
- Re: What you quoted was incorrect as I have proven. These are not the specs for any Disc format. - Martin419 07:55:52 12/23/05 (6)
- as I said that site's information is incorrect. Here are links to the real CD Red Book and DVD formats. - Teresa 18:21:13 12/23/05 (5)
- You have proved absolutely nothing . . . - Martin419 05:48:20 12/27/05 (4)
- Do you have trouble with the English language? Re-read all of my posts. - Teresa 06:51:56 12/27/05 (3)
- Teresa, you reveal deeper level of insanity with each successive post . . . - Martin419 14:28:19 12/27/05 (2)
- Martin you really need to learn how to read! I wish I knew what your obsession with a KNOWN DEFECTIVE FORMAT IS. - Teresa 20:50:43 12/27/05 (1)
- You wrote: "DualDiscs damage real players". Show me one. nt - Martin419 09:02:55 12/28/05 (1)