Home Hi-Rez Highway

New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology.

I think it's mostly a matter of preference

I liked the sound of the SACD 1000 stock, mostly for the full midrange, good soundstaging, and great bass. I'll have to admit the treble response was lacking in air & extension. It also sounded slow, due to the strong bass I think. Alex's work fixed both of those problems and improved it in several other areas as well.

I also remember the stock unit had a pretty laid back presentation, which I liked but others did not. I tried a Sony 999ES for a month, which everybody was raving about at the time, and it was definitely faster and more detailed than the SACD 1000. I thought it was a very good player for $1000, but compared to the SACD 1000 it was a bit too forward for me in my system and had a smaller soundstage.

So mostly, I think it's a matter of preference. For a while, it seemed there were two camps on this forum, those who preferred the Sony/Denon sound and those who preferred the Marantz/Philips sound. I imagine tcell, who prefers the CE775 to the SACD 1000, is amazed that there are people who like the SACD 1000. On the other hand, I am constantly amazed by the number of people who seem to like the Denon 2900.

Dave


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Parts Connexion  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.