In Reply to: Re: More on "The Bells" posted by Doktor Brahms on October 31, 2005 at 11:02:21:
Kondrashin - well, that is indeed a mixed blessing. Idiomatic, yes. And the baritone is surely one of the best ever to record this piece. But the band is scrappy as it gets. Blech. Pletnev, goes to the other extreme - so polished and calculated that it loses all emotional connection for me. Rozhdestvensky is somewhere in between, but I don't care for his soloists and the audio kinda sux. Stefano's recording with the Bulgarian National RSO is just what you'd expect; the baritone can't carry a tune.The recording by Kitajenko and the Danish RSO is a bit slower than I'd prefer, but otherwise pretty good. I rather like the baritone Hynninen, although I suspect native Russian speakers cringe at his accent. It's much better than Anissimov's recording for Naxos, with the shakey Melnikov instead of a baritone. Svetlanov is, as always, frustrating. Dutoit's recording with the Philadelphia Orchestra is rather wooden and lacking in atmosphere, especially at the very end, which just sorta falls flat.
Of my 15 recordings, I tend to pull the Kitajenko more often than any others.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: More on "The Bells" - Amphissa 23:04:49 10/31/05 (0)