Home Hi-Rez Highway

New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology.

Re: More on "The Bells"

Kondrashin - well, that is indeed a mixed blessing. Idiomatic, yes. And the baritone is surely one of the best ever to record this piece. But the band is scrappy as it gets. Blech. Pletnev, goes to the other extreme - so polished and calculated that it loses all emotional connection for me. Rozhdestvensky is somewhere in between, but I don't care for his soloists and the audio kinda sux. Stefano's recording with the Bulgarian National RSO is just what you'd expect; the baritone can't carry a tune.

The recording by Kitajenko and the Danish RSO is a bit slower than I'd prefer, but otherwise pretty good. I rather like the baritone Hynninen, although I suspect native Russian speakers cringe at his accent. It's much better than Anissimov's recording for Naxos, with the shakey Melnikov instead of a baritone. Svetlanov is, as always, frustrating. Dutoit's recording with the Philadelphia Orchestra is rather wooden and lacking in atmosphere, especially at the very end, which just sorta falls flat.

Of my 15 recordings, I tend to pull the Kitajenko more often than any others.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  The Cable Cooker  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • Re: More on "The Bells" - Amphissa 23:04:49 10/31/05 (0)


You can not post to an archived thread.