In Reply to: Nonsense.. posted by Frank.. on February 17, 2006 at 03:33:44:
but I do not delude myself that either one actually has more resolution than LP.I am a realist and admit it is the lower cost, convenience and near LP quality that attracts me to SACD and 96kHz and 192kHz DVD-Audio. But I will not delude myself into believing that either one is sonically superior, I cannot suspend belief in the same way that you can.
Here is a simple test for you: compare The Weavers Reunion at Carnegie Hall – 1963 96kHz 24 Bit Classic Records DAD to the 180 Gram LP pressing of the same. While this is one of the best sounding DVD-Audios in my collection. The LP version is more realistic, I wish it was not true as I hate all the mess and the care and up-keeping of Vinyl.
I do hope I live long enough to hear Digital surpass Vinyl, perhaps 32 Bit 384kHz? Who knows?
Teresa
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Delusions frank. I prefer the lower cost and convenience of SACD and DVD-Audio but - Teresa 10:57:45 02/17/06 (1)
- I don't have a dog in this fight, but it's the implementation, not the format nt - charlies824 11:56:37 02/17/06 (0)