In Reply to: The more you crank it up, the more dynamic range you get, but also the more amplifier power you need posted by Christine Tham on September 13, 2005 at 15:47:45:
I tend to agree with that statement. I certainly can't hear it. However, I also tend to believe that non-integral sample rate conversion cannot be audibly distinguished from integral sample rate conversion. And there is certainly no conlusive evidence to the contrary for that either.There is a psychological effect for me however. Just knowing that there will be temporal errors introduced in non-integral SRC, regardless of how infinitesimally small (inaudible) they may be, just rubs me the wrong way. So I prefer integral SRC.
For the same reason I prefer high bit/sample rate PCM to DSD. Why bother with a system that generates measurable noise-shaping artifacts, whether audible or not, when you can have a measuably cleaner PCM reproduction.
But that's just the engineer in me I guess. I always prefer the most elegant solution to a problem.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- SACD ultrasonic noise irrelevant... - meisterkleef 10:37:11 09/14/05 (23)
- Re: SACD ultrasonic noise irrelevant... - Christine Tham 14:44:22 09/14/05 (22)
- A very frank discussion from a record label re DSD . . . - Martin419 10:10:27 09/15/05 (7)
- DSD is dead signal... very dead signal... LOL!!! - SF tech 12:48:12 09/16/05 (2)
- Re: DSD is dead signal... very dead signal... LOL!!! - Martin419 02:01:45 09/19/05 (1)
- OK... But I still think the assessment is way off the mark. (nt) - SF tech 08:03:56 09/21/05 (0)
- eloquent indeed - tunenut 22:37:51 09/15/05 (1)
- Re: eloquent indeed - Martin419 04:10:11 09/16/05 (0)
- Can you please attribute the quote? Otherwise worthless. - meisterkleef 13:13:49 09/15/05 (1)
- It was "off the record" . . . - Martin419 13:44:37 09/15/05 (0)
- Forgot to mention, most PCM dithering algorithms generate similar ultrasonic noise - Christine Tham 20:42:40 09/14/05 (13)
- Slight correction... - Frank.. 02:54:35 09/15/05 (12)
- Corrections to your corrections! - Christine Tham 13:55:25 09/15/05 (5)
- AD converter issues.. - Frank.. 03:06:28 09/19/05 (0)
- Re: Corrections to your corrections! - Frank.. 23:32:39 09/18/05 (0)
- If you've ever used any of Philips' DSD software, Frank... - Michi 14:27:48 09/16/05 (2)
- Re: If you've ever used any of Philips' DSD software, Frank... - Frank.. 23:37:19 09/18/05 (0)
- Interesting! I did not know that! (nt) - Christine Tham 15:48:41 09/16/05 (0)
- Exactly right. Besides we're talking about audibilty... - meisterkleef 08:26:56 09/15/05 (5)
- Re: Exactly right. Besides we're talking about audibilty... - Christine Tham 14:09:33 09/15/05 (2)
- Re: Exactly right. Besides we're talking about audibilty... - evector 18:22:03 09/16/05 (0)
- Great charts! Thanks! (NT) - meisterkleef 10:41:08 09/16/05 (0)
- Another slight correction.. - Frank.. 11:07:28 09/15/05 (1)
- Thanks! I differentiated because PCM is filtered above passband. (NT) - meisterkleef 13:11:17 09/15/05 (0)