What difference does it possibly make if a 192Khz/24 Bit DVD-Audio disc is made using MLP or uncompressed PCM? MLP doesn't lose any bits, so other than saving space on the disc I don't see how it can hurt anything?What is the difference, if any, in these new DVD-Audio dics purporting to store uncompressed 192/24 bit stereo data, vs those that use MLP packing to store the same data?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - 192 Khz 24 bit MLP vs Uncompressed - uzun 17:43:49 01/31/05 (17)
- I'm voting NO difference. Last night I played the AIX Start Here Sampler - Teresa 15:37:08 02/01/05 (0)
- Playing time (nt) - Frank.. 06:52:02 02/01/05 (0)
- probably no difference - tunenut 00:05:30 02/01/05 (14)
- If straight uncompressed LPCM at 192/24 2-ch already fits into the DVD's max bandwidth . . . - Martin419 08:03:58 02/01/05 (2)
- Yep! I keep forgetting that 192/24 just fits into max DVD transfer rate ... - Christine Tham 14:37:06 02/01/05 (1)
- Re: Yep! I keep forgetting that 192/24 just fits into max DVD transfer rate ... - John Kotches 14:44:09 02/01/05 (0)
- Re: probably no difference - John Kotches 07:43:34 02/01/05 (0)
- Re: probably no difference - Frank.. 07:00:51 02/01/05 (0)
- Re: probably no difference - Mathias Myka 01:07:15 02/01/05 (8)
- that;s what I would expect - tunenut 09:16:12 02/01/05 (0)
- but tunenut is right ... - Christine Tham 01:12:54 02/01/05 (6)
- Re: but tunenut is right ... - John Kotches 07:39:26 02/01/05 (3)
- real world example - tunenut 09:17:39 02/01/05 (2)
- Re: real world example - John Kotches 10:00:21 02/01/05 (1)
- don't take it too seriously - tunenut 10:13:52 02/01/05 (0)
- Re: but tunenut is right ... - Mathias Myka 01:41:38 02/01/05 (1)
- Re: but tunenut is right ... - John Kotches 07:41:41 02/01/05 (0)