|
DVD-Audiobahn New DVD-Audio music releases and talk about the latest players. |
|
|
|
DVD-Audiobahn New DVD-Audio music releases and talk about the latest players. |
|
In Reply to: Trade off between sample rate and accuracy posted by Christine Tham on January 21, 2005 at 11:55:49:
As mentioned in my reply to Martin, to my ears 48/24 is inadequate. I have not heard 96/16, but have heard 96/24 and 192/24. Eagles - Hotel California at 192/24 sounds very realistic to me. 96/24 sounds good enough but the 48/24 I have heard has not really impressed me. Maybe my hearing prefers higher sampling compared to some others?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Trade off between sample rate and accuracy - The Sound Guy 05:09:45 01/22/05 (10)
- you can't simply compare different recordings at different sample rates ... - Christine Tham 14:02:51 01/22/05 (9)
- Incorrect experiment - The Sound Guy 02:25:00 01/24/05 (6)
- sorry - but i have no idea what you are talking about (nt) - Christine Tham 02:37:18 01/24/05 (5)
- Beat frequency - The Sound Guy 03:16:31 01/24/05 (4)
- And what does this have to do with different sampling rates??? - Christine Tham 13:13:53 01/24/05 (3)
- Re: And what does this have to do with different sampling rates??? - The Sound Guy 19:49:03 01/24/05 (2)
- Re: And what does this have to do with different sampling rates??? - Christine Tham 00:12:41 01/25/05 (1)
- Sampling Rates, poor HD versus good CD, and lousy Point-of-View Recordings... (wow!) - Presto 14:39:23 01/25/05 (0)
- Re: you can't simply compare different recordings at different sample rates ... - The Sound Guy 21:40:57 01/22/05 (1)
- sorry - i've deleted all the comparison recordings i've made ... - Christine Tham 13:04:51 01/23/05 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
