Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Excellent, thanks!




My subscription to TAS commenced in the very early-90s. That issue from Nov/Dec 1988 was bought from, I don't recall, some San Francisco book or record store.

In college in those early-90s, I'd bounce audio ideas off of my friend (none of whom was an audiophile). Bless them, their reactions, questions, and feedback made you take a step back from audio, think, look in the mirror, and just become more honest. My friends noticed that I subscribed to both TAS and Stereophile. And when they asked for my honest take on those two magazines, my answer was that, in general, TAS' reviewers, by using a greater variety of music, and connecting the music with audio, were more relatable and reliable. Stereophile's reviewers had really weird musical tastes, nothing a regular popular music fan could relate to. Moreover, you'd go to a store, check out a product which Stereophile had reviewed, and not square that to what was written in the review.

If you were continuing to be honest, you told your friends that you wished TAS would do measurements. Stereophile's measurements may or may not correlate with what you hear, but the measurements could tip you off about incompatibilities.

In 2004, John Marks reviewed the Wilson Benesch A.C.T. without a number at the end. Time has gone by so fast, we blink, and 2004 was a whopping 20 years ago.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Atma-Sphere Music Systems, Inc.  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.